On 09/09/2007 11:09 PM, Rene Herman wrote: > Given that the only difference is that I wait less, yours would've > worked as well -- thanks for looking into this! And could you viceversa > test this on AD1848 and perhaps resubmit if you agree? Oh, and I forgot to say (sigh) that I use a mdelay() and not an msleep() in the ad1848 one due to the 1 ms being short enough and didn't keep the snd_printd() because if one, then all please... If you yourself insist on keeping a change like that split off, then doing that as a second patch ontop is best I guess but I suspect Takashi wouldn't mind trivial stuff like that anymore than I would -- we're not rule-driven robots... Rene. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
