At Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:43:50 -0700 (PDT), Trent Piepho wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Jul 2007, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Em Sáb, 2007-07-21 às 17:36 -0700, Trent Piepho escreveu: > > > 01/01: bttv: Fix Viewcast Osprey 440 support > > > http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/v4l-dvb?cmd=changeset;node=8e72fe5675b3 > > > > > > I have two other changes that only affect the ALSA driver part. Should I > > > send those to ALSA or to you? > > > > Please send to ALSA guys, c/c me. > > Ok, I'll do that. What about the two lines to bt87x.c that this patch added? > I seemed logical to me that they should be part of the same patch at git as > the changes to bttv-cards.c, but I suppose it's not 100% necessary to do so, > the kernel will still compile and not crash. In such a case, I think one patch makes more sense. Mauro, please apply it from your tree all together? > Do you plan to send this to git as one patch, or to strip out the ALSA change? > I'm just wondering if I should send these two lines to the ALSA people as a > separate patch, of if they will get them into their hg via a kernel-sync > patch. My bt87x patches depend on this one, so somehow the ALSA hg needs > to get this change before I can send them the next two. > > The problem really, is that having two divers for the same chip split into > v4l-dvb and ALSA like this a pain. IMHO, it would make a lot more sense > to put the bttv alsa driver into v4l-dvb, like the saa7134 alsa and oss > and cx88 alsa drivers are. OTOH, fixing cx88 and saa7134 codes are also painful for us :) thanks, Takashi _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
