I applied the patch and it seems to work fine now :) Should we submit
a patch for kernel 2.6.22?
Thanks,
Jan
On 7/2/07, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> At Mon, 02 Jul 2007 16:11:21 +0200,
> I wrote:
> >
> > At Sat, 30 Jun 2007 15:26:16 +0200,
> > Jan de Mooij wrote:
> > >
> > > I recompiled alsa-driver with --with-debug=full, and I attached the
> > > files you asked for. In the dmesg file, alsa output starts on line
> > > 453.
> > >
> > > Thanks for your help. Please let me know if you need more information.
> >
> > The output from kernel looks good. So I wonder where the value 0x15
> > came from at all. Could you trace it, e.g. by adding printk's
> > appropriately in stac92xx_auto_fill_dac_nids()?
>
> After a further code-looking, I found a problematic part.
> Could you try the patch below?
>
>
> Takashi
>
> diff -r 054dc7195722 pci/hda/patch_sigmatel.c
> --- a/pci/hda/patch_sigmatel.c Mon Jul 02 16:03:12 2007 +0200
> +++ b/pci/hda/patch_sigmatel.c Mon Jul 02 16:15:39 2007 +0200
> @@ -1228,7 +1228,7 @@ static int is_in_dac_nids(struct sigmate
> * and 9202/925x. For those, dac_nids[] must be hard-coded.
> */
> static int stac92xx_auto_fill_dac_nids(struct hda_codec *codec,
> - const struct auto_pin_cfg *cfg)
> + struct auto_pin_cfg *cfg)
> {
> struct sigmatel_spec *spec = codec->spec;
> int i, j, conn_len = 0;
> @@ -1253,6 +1253,13 @@ static int stac92xx_auto_fill_dac_nids(s
> }
>
> if (j == conn_len) {
> + if (spec->multiout.num_dacs > 0) {
> + /* we have already working output pins,
> + * so let's drop the broken ones again
> + */
> + cfg->line_outs = spec->multiout.num_dacs;
> + break;
> + }
> /* error out, no available DAC found */
> snd_printk(KERN_ERR
> "%s: No available DAC for pin 0x%x\n",
>
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
