Alan Cox wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:10:49 -0400 > Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Alan Cox wrote: >>>>> I'm not even sure this report is IT8212 related rather than just an IRQ >>>>> storm >>>> Why does the driver report "irq 0"? >>>> >>>> ata7: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd <blah> ctl <blah> bmdma <blah> irq 0 <==== >>>> >>>> Above that, the ACPI layer says it assigned IRQ 20 >>> Because the libata core code in 2.6.22rc6 reports all the ports and IRQ >>> values wrongly ? >> AFAIK that was fixed, for IRQ. Please point out examples where it >> remains broken... > > 2.6.22-rc6 it is broken, for all the systems I've looked at, as are the > port numbers. Tejun posted fixes for the IRQ but they do not seem to have > been applied, or if they were it was post -rc6 to a git tree. I've seen the patch that eventually became 22888423b3b1b96573250671afb5b72ea4364902 from Olof Johansson but nothing from Tejun on the subject. Jeff _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
