On 5/29/07, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> wrote: > At Tue, 29 May 2007 17:29:10 +0200, > I wrote: > > > > At Tue, 29 May 2007 16:20:33 +0100, > > Ivan N. Zlatev wrote: > > > > > > On 5/29/07, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > And, does this volume have any influence on the quality of recorded > > > > sound at all? If not, we should remove this control rather than > > > > keeping a dangerous thing... > > > > > > > > > > Yes. This controls the microphone boost level (without boost the sound > > > recorded has *very* low volume). Also Windows shows up a +20db > > > microphone boost slider on this machine. > > > > Ah, OK. Then the control seems indicates the wrong max level indeed. > > So, we need two fixes: > > > > - rename "Mux Capture Volume" to more intuitive one, such as "Capture > > Boost" or something like that. > > > > - limit the max level of this volume to 2. > > > > The latter is a bit hard to fix. Let's see whether I can do some > > hack... > > Could you check the patch below? > (This doesn't rename but just fix the latter item.) > > > Takashi > > diff -r 200fc3a7ef62 pci/hda/hda_codec.c > --- a/pci/hda/hda_codec.c Tue May 29 18:01:06 2007 +0200 > +++ b/pci/hda/hda_codec.c Tue May 29 18:17:15 2007 +0200 > @@ -711,6 +711,19 @@ static u32 query_amp_caps(struct hda_cod > info->status |= INFO_AMP_CAPS; > } > return info->amp_caps; > +} > + > +int snd_hda_override_amp_caps(struct hda_codec *codec, hda_nid_t nid, int dir, > + unsigned int caps) > +{ > + struct hda_amp_info *info; > + > + info = get_alloc_amp_hash(codec, HDA_HASH_KEY(nid, dir, 0)); > + if (!info) > + return -EINVAL; > + info->amp_caps = caps; > + info->status |= INFO_AMP_CAPS; > + return 0; > } > > /* > diff -r 200fc3a7ef62 pci/hda/hda_local.h > --- a/pci/hda/hda_local.h Tue May 29 18:01:06 2007 +0200 > +++ b/pci/hda/hda_local.h Tue May 29 18:17:02 2007 +0200 > @@ -277,5 +277,7 @@ static inline u32 get_wcaps(struct hda_c > return codec->wcaps[nid - codec->start_nid]; > } > > +int snd_hda_override_amp_caps(struct hda_codec *codec, hda_nid_t nid, int dir, > + unsigned int caps); > > #endif /* __SOUND_HDA_LOCAL_H */ > diff -r 200fc3a7ef62 pci/hda/patch_sigmatel.c > --- a/pci/hda/patch_sigmatel.c Tue May 29 18:01:06 2007 +0200 > +++ b/pci/hda/patch_sigmatel.c Tue May 29 18:12:30 2007 +0200 > @@ -2033,6 +2033,12 @@ static int patch_stac925x(struct hda_cod > > codec->patch_ops = stac92xx_patch_ops; > > + /* Fix Mux capture level; max to 2 */ > + snd_hda_override_amp_caps(codec, 0x12, HDA_OUTPUT, > + (0 << AC_AMPCAP_OFFSET_SHIFT) | > + (2 << AC_AMPCAP_NUM_STEPS_SHIFT) | > + (0x27 << AC_AMPCAP_STEP_SIZE_SHIFT) | > + (0 << AC_AMPCAP_MUTE_SHIFT)); > return 0; > } > > Works, BUT the last hunk is at the wrong place. The snd_hda_override_amp_caps call should be in patch_stac922x (...) and not in patch_stac925x (...) Cheers! -- Ivan N. Zlatev Web: http://www.i-nZ.net "It's all some kind of whacked out conspiracy." _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel