Re: submitting a patch against the ALSA repos

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At Fri, 18 May 2007 11:21:14 +0100,
Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> 
> On 18/05/07, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > At Fri, 18 May 2007 10:16:26 +0100,
> > Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> > >
> > > I have submitted my patch against the 2.6.21 kernel tree but I dare
> > > say I need to actually submit it against the alsa repos.
> >
> > If you submit a patch to a new driver, it should be against the very
> > latest ALSA tree, which is basically based on the latest mm tree
> > (2.6.22-rc*-mm*) and planned to be merged into the next kernel
> > (2.6.23).
> >
> > Is there any difference between 2.6.21 and 22 regarding SH arch
> > specific things?  At least, there is no difference regarding the sound
> > infrastructure.
> 
> 
> None that I am aware of, I'll post a patch against that tree later
> today just to be sure though.

I committed your latest version right now to ALSA HG tree.
Let's fix the code by patches from now on.
It's easier to review, too :)


thanks,

Takashi
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux