On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 06:27:44PM +0200, Rene Herman wrote:
>
> The Intel 430TX and 440BX (which also uses the PIIX4 if I'm not mistaken)
> were hugely popular chipsets in the later generation of boards that still
> had ISA slots and given that noone will deperately want the MPU-401 IRQ
> assigned; how would you feel about the attached? Just adds the preffered
> options minus the MPU IRQ as the first acceptable. Works for me...
Fine with me. Maybe the MPU IRQ should be omitted alltogether? You tell
me.
Thanks for the testing you've done.
> As to the PnP part; other than that IRQ9 thing everything also working fine
Aren't you having problems loading the module after a resource allocation
failure? I find that I need this additional patch to be able to retry:
--- linux-2.6.20.6-clean/drivers/pnp/driver.c 2007-02-04 19:44:54.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.20.6-ril/drivers/pnp/driver.c 2007-04-15 10:10:35.000000000 +0200
@@ -96,13 +96,13 @@
if (!(pnp_drv->flags & PNP_DRIVER_RES_DO_NOT_CHANGE)) {
error = pnp_activate_dev(pnp_dev);
if (error < 0)
- return error;
+ goto fail;
}
} else if ((pnp_drv->flags & PNP_DRIVER_RES_DISABLE)
== PNP_DRIVER_RES_DISABLE) {
error = pnp_disable_dev(pnp_dev);
if (error < 0)
- return error;
+ goto fail;
}
error = 0;
if (pnp_drv->probe) {
Without it, the device stays attached to the driver. What happens is
pnp_attach_device (device, driver);
error = pnp_activate_dev(device);
if (error < 0)
return error;
...
fail:
pnp_detach_device (device, driver);
return error;
--
Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
