On 03/26/2007 07:14 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote: > Most likely we have to add some fix for building on the older > kernels, but I'll do it tomorrow... I've been wondering about that. Would it be good to say "version 1.0.15 will be the last version of alsa to support kernels < 2.6"? (1.0.15, or 1.0.16, or ...). Older kernels are likely still used a lot in embedded but do they need other sound hardware then what's already present in alsa currently? If they do, would telling to them to "upgrade already" be unacceptable? 2.6 is over 3 years old... The old driver tree could be maintained in bugfix-mode only then and the new driver tree would just equal the kernel tree. Rene. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
