At Sat, 10 Mar 2007 21:13:44 -0800,
Allyn, Mark A wrote:
>
> Folks:
>
> I have yet another question; this having to do with the arrays of dmic
> nids for the STAC 9205. I look at the
> patch_sigmatel.c file; the following section:
>
> ================================================
> static hda_nid_t stac9205_mux_nids[2] = {
> 0x19, 0x1a
> };
>
> static hda_nid_t stac9205_dmic_nids[3] = {
> 0x17, 0x18, 0
> };
>
> static hda_nid_t stac9200_pin_nids[8] = {
> 0x08, 0x09, 0x0d, 0x0e,
> 0x0f, 0x10, 0x11, 0x12,
> ================================================
>
> I notice that the dmic_nids array of hda_nit_t structure has one with a
> value of zero,
> but the others, pin_nids and mux_nids don't. Later in the patch_9205
> code, the num_dmics
> is 2.
>
> Why the extra dmic_nid with a value of 0?
Just superfluous. Will fix on HG tree soon (currently the server
seems down...)
Takashi
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
