On 3/2/07, Lee Revell <rlrevell@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > nice -n -20 arecord | nice -n -20 aplay should work also... Actually, no, it doesn't. Negative nice levels are no substitute for SCHED_FIFO priority -- not if you care about controlled end-to-end latency. > Of course you have to pass additional arguments to aplay and arecord > to set the format (-f cd or -f dat) as they default to 8Khz mono. Sample aplay -C | aplay -P incantation posted along with the sched_fifo patch a week or so ago. Cheers, - Michael ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
