On 3/1/07, Dmitry Baikov <dsbaikov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > And since I already rewritten this code with snd_seq_ev_set_direct() + > poll(), I have a question: > Does queue + snd_seq_ev_schedule_real() offer better real resolution > than poll (which gives 1 ms)? On older kernels it depends on whether ALSA sequencer is configured to use RTC or regular kernel timers. And poll() resolution is 4ms by default (HZ=250) not 1ms. Anyway mainline Linux kernel has hrtimers now. So shouldn't the resolution of all timeouts be much better than 1ms? Lee ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
