I suppose it could, but what's the point? If devfs has been removed in newer kernels, then it won't be defined, right? Adding a kernel wrapper would be inefficient, plus it would be harder to contain vendor kernels that still implement devfs for compatibility. Tobin On Sat, 2006-10-21 at 16:42 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > On Sat, 2006-10-21 at 12:47 -0700, Tobin Davis wrote: > > > > static int cards_limit = 1; > > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEVFS_FS > > +static int device_mode = S_IFCHR | S_IRUGO | S_IWUGO; > > ++static struct snd_minor *mptr; > > +#endif > > > > Shouldn't this be wrapped in a version check or something? Devfs has > been removed from recent kernels. > > Lee > -- Tobin Davis <tdavis@xxxxxxxxxxxx> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
