On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Alan Stern wrote: > On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > > On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Jiri Kosina wrote: > > > > > I am getting kernel panic (NULL pointer dereference) on boot, with kernel > > > compiled with CONFIG_SND_MPU401_UART=y, on machine which does not have > > > this piece of hardware. > > > > > > I have traced the problem down to > > > sound/drivers/mpu401/mpu401.c:snd_mpu401_probe() returning EINVAL, when > > > either port or IRQ parameters are not specified. > > > > > > In such case, the drivers/base/bus.c:bus_attach_device() does not perform > > > klist_add_tail() call, but rather sets dev->is_registered to 0. This flag > > > is however not checked by the driver, so later on, when > > > alsa_card_mpu401_init() is called and platform_device_register_simple() > > > fails, the following callchain happens, causing NULL pointer dereference: > > > alsa_card_mpu401_init() -> platform_device_unregister() -> > > > platform_device_del() -> device_del() -> bus_remove_device() -> > > > klist_del() -> BOOM (the entry was not added to klist in > > > bus_attach_device()). > > > > > > Proper solution is returning ENODEV from the ->probe() routine, which will > > > be correctly handled then by the rest of the device-driver attaching > > > subsystem (namely the retval check in bus_attach_device()). The following > > > patch fixes the problem, please apply. > > > > Unfortunately, I do not think that it's a proper solution. I think that > > platform device layer should play more nicely and if probe() fails for > > a reason and if platform_device_register_simple() does not set > > IS_ERR(), then platform_device_unregister() must be callable to free > > all resources. > > > > Also, you've proposed to not fix all returns in snd_mpu401_probe() only > > first two. > > > > I would reject this patch and fix drivers/base/bus.c. The problematic > > change is in commit f2eaae197f4590c4d96f31b09b0ee9067421a95c and this > > patch will probably fix it: > > Your patch is right as far as it goes, but it misses part of the problem. > device_add() shouldn't ignore the return value from bus_attach_device(). > That's why we ended up trying to unregister a device which never was > properly registered in the first place. > > What do you think of this addition to your patch (untested)? Your addition looks good. Acked from me. Jaroslav > Index: 18g20/drivers/base/bus.c > =================================================================== > --- 18g20.orig/drivers/base/bus.c > +++ 18g20/drivers/base/bus.c > @@ -453,8 +453,10 @@ void bus_remove_device(struct device * d > remove_deprecated_bus_links(dev); > sysfs_remove_link(&dev->bus->devices.kobj, dev->bus_id); > device_remove_attrs(dev->bus, dev); > - dev->is_registered = 0; > - klist_del(&dev->knode_bus); > + if (dev->is_registered) { > + dev->is_registered = 0; > + klist_del(&dev->knode_bus); > + } > pr_debug("bus %s: remove device %s\n", dev->bus->name, dev->bus_id); > device_release_driver(dev); > put_bus(dev->bus); > Index: 18g20/drivers/base/core.c > =================================================================== > --- 18g20.orig/drivers/base/core.c > +++ 18g20/drivers/base/core.c > @@ -485,7 +485,8 @@ int device_add(struct device *dev) > if ((error = bus_add_device(dev))) > goto BusError; > kobject_uevent(&dev->kobj, KOBJ_ADD); > - bus_attach_device(dev); > + if ((error = bus_attach_device(dev))) > + goto AttachError; > if (parent) > klist_add_tail(&dev->knode_parent, &parent->klist_children); > > @@ -504,6 +505,8 @@ int device_add(struct device *dev) > kfree(class_name); > put_device(dev); > return error; > + AttachError: > + bus_remove_device(dev); > BusError: > device_pm_remove(dev); > PMError: ----- Jaroslav Kysela <perex@xxxxxxx> Linux Kernel Sound Maintainer ALSA Project, SUSE Labs ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel