At Thu, 1 Jun 2006 17:00:30 +0200 (CEST), Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > At Thu, 1 Jun 2006 16:08:13 +0200 (CEST), > > Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > > > > Yes. It's similar but a really big difference if you consider about > > > > 32/64bit compatibility. > > > > > > > > Also, the order of "TLV" is type-length-value. > > > > > > Ok, the second version of my patch. Note: in the ca0106 driver, only > > > three lines (if I don't count one empty line) are required to add > > > the dB scale information. > > > > The existence of flag makes the things complicated. > > I prefer removing flag and make the ioctl numid-specific. > > It might be. It's really small work for the user space and we may use > flags in future to determine ioctl version or some other extension at the > ioctl level. Well, but this ioctl is damn simple. Just query a control element for its TLV data. It's supposed to be the one containing all. If we need a filter of returned data, the query header should contain a type field rather than flags. Takashi _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
