SFGate: Customers downgrade airline service

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 Given that American's not at the bottom, I guess this survey took place
before the baggage fee went into effect.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This article was sent to you by someone who found it on SFGate.
The original article can be found on SFGate.com here:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=3D/c/a/2008/05/28/DDO010S351=
.DTL
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday, May 28, 2008 (SF Chronicle)
Customers downgrade airline service
Ed Perkins, Tribune Media Services


   The most recent University of Michigan's American Customer Satisfaction
Index reports that airlines, which scored below the IRS in customer
satisfaction last year, dropped even further this year. They posted the
lowest overall score among any of the 19 industrial categories covered
this quarter. If you've flown lately, you probably aren't surprised. And
although I'm as interested in the numbers as the next traveler, to me, the
biggest question isn't "how bad the score," it's "what can travelers do
about it?"
   A few more dismal details. Among the hundred or so individual companies,
one airline - US Airways - tied for bottom score with only two others,
Comcast and Charter in the cable/TV sector. And only four individual
companies in other sectors scored below the aggregate airline score, at
62. Among the seven lines showing individual scores:
   -- Southwest again earned the top score. Its 79 was 17 points higher than
the No. 2-named line.
   -- "All Others," a sub-aggregate of smaller lines, came in second at a
respectable 75.
   -- Continental, American and Delta were closely bunched at 60-62.
   -- And the bottom places were "won" by Northwest, United and US Airways,
at 54-57.
   In any other economic sector, scores as low as the low-end airline numbe=
rs
would signal incipient market failure. But the airlines keep going - and
travelers keep buying tickets - despite lousy service. I take several
conclusions from these numbers:
   -- Clearly, a large part of the fault lies outside the airlines' control.
The horrendous increase in the price of fuel has put all of them under
tremendous pressures to cut costs wherever they think they can save a
nickel. They've long since run out of fat to cut; now they're cutting
muscle.
   -- Some fault - for flight delays and airport hassles - lies with the
federal government, which has lagged inexcusably in modernizing the air
traffic control system. The Transportation Security Agency is also
culpable for slow and sometimes heavy-handed airport screening.
   -- But the airlines, themselves, bear a lot of the blame - for delays,
lost baggage and many other ills. Delays, especially, are partially the
result of the airlines' insistence on scheduling too many flights in and
out of our busiest airports on small planes. And slow baggage delivery,
lost baggage and such are obviously cases of ineffective management.
   -- Mergers certainly aren't the answer: Putting two losers together almo=
st
never results in a winner.
   But don't forget your own responsibility for the sad situation. One of t=
he
reasons air service is so lousy - cramped seats, disappearing cabin
service and such - is that you have repeatedly demonstrated that although
you want better service, you won't pay for it. Over the past 20 years,
dozens of startup lines have tried to make a go of "pay a bit more for
better coach service" business models and all have either failed or
reverted to the "cheap cattle-car" model.
   What, then, can you do? Certainly fly the lines with the higher scores
whenever you can. Although most of you can't afford astronomical
first-class fares, JetBlue and United offer "pay more, get more" options
in coach. Also, urge your congressional delegation to support reform of
the air traffic control system - and provide an adequate budget. Beyond
that, there isn't much you can do, unless you decide to stay home.
   Let's end on a somewhat brighter note. Big hotel chains continue to score
well in customer satisfaction. The sector average was 75, up from last
year. Top chains were Marriott, Hyatt and Hilton, all at 78, with Starwood
and Inter-Continental close behind at 74. Even the low end of the sector -
Choice, Wyndham and Best Western - earned respectable 70-71 scores, well
ahead of any airline other than Southwest. And big, full-service
restaurant chains scored even higher, at 80. Clearly, although you might
have a lousy flight to your destination, you can look forward to good
treatment once you arrive.

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright 2008 SF Chronicle

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

If you wish to unsubscribe from the AIRLINE List, please send an E-mail to:
"listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx".  Within the body of the text, only write the following:"SIGNOFF AIRLINE".

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]