SFGate: Airborne Internet Might Bring Turbulence

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



=20
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This article was sent to you by someone who found it on SFGate.
The original article can be found on SFGate.com here:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=3D/n/a/2007/12/24/financial/=
f051355S14.DTL
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Monday, December 24, 2007 (AP)
Airborne Internet Might Bring Turbulence
By ANICK JESDANUN, AP Internet Writer


   (12-24) 05:13 PST NEW YORK, (AP) --

   Seat 17D is yapping endlessly on an Internet phone call. Seat 16F is
flaming Seat 16D with expletive-laden chats. Seat 16E is too busy surfing
porn sites to care. Seat 17C just wants to sleep.

   Welcome to the promise of the Internet at 33,000 feet — and the
questions of etiquette, openness and free speech that airlines and service
providers will have to grapple with as they bring Internet access to the
skies in the coming months.

   "This gets into a ticklish area," said Vint Cerf, one of the Internet's
chief inventors and generally a critic of network restrictions. "Airlines
have to be sensitive to the fact that customers are (seated) close
together and may be able to see each other's PC screens. More to the
point, young people are often aboard the plane."

   Technology providers and airlines are already making decisions. Some will
block services like Internet phone calls altogether while others will put
limits and install filters on content. And traffic management tools that
are frowned upon on terra firma could be commonplace in the air.

   Panasonic Avionics Corp., a Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. unit
testing airborne services on Australia's Qantas Airways Ltd., is designing
its high-speed Internet services to block sites on "an objectionable
list," including porn and violence, said David Bruner, executive director
for corporate sales and marketing.

   He said airlines based in more restrictive countries could choose to
expand the list.

   The company also is recommending that airlines permit Internet-based pho=
ne
calls only on handsets with wireless Wi-Fi capabilities — the
technology delivering access within the passenger cabin. Bruner said the
company believes Wi-Fi handsets use less bandwidth than telephone software
that runs on laptops.

   Airlines, he said, also could block incoming calls — and the
annoying ring tones they produce — or designate periods of quiet
time.

   OnAir, which has European certification for airborne cellular services,
plans to give airlines similar choices, Chief Executive Benoit Debains
said. Although some airlines are concerned about noise, Debains said,
enabling voice would generate more revenue than data-only services.

   Air France, which plans to start allowing cellular calls through OnAir
within months, said it would see how people use such services before
crafting rules.

   "Are you going to reach your wife to tell her what you did the entire day
or just tell her, `Can you pick me up at the airport?'" Air France
spokeswoman Marina Tymen said, adding that passengers might tell the
airline that data services fulfill all their needs.

   U.S. airlines are largely taking the opposite approach.

   With possible exceptions for crew and federal air marshals, flights on A=
MR
Corp.'s American Airlines and Alaska Air Group Inc.'s Alaska Airlines
won't have access to Internet-based phone services like eBay Inc.'s Skype.

   Discount startup Virgin America is also considering a ban.

   "An airborne environment is a confined environment," said Charles Ogilvi=
e,
Virgin's director of in-flight entertainment and partnerships. "You don't
want 22B yapping away or playing on a boom box."

   Airlines have offered in-flight phone services before, but their high
costs have limited their popularity. By contrast, Internet phone calls are
free or cheap, particularly for passengers already paying for in-flight
access to check e-mail or surf Web sites.

   Meanwhile, American, Alaska and Virgin have no plans to filter sites bas=
ed
on their content. At most, an airline may manage traffic and delay large
downloads, or in Virgin's case give passengers the option of enabling
controls for their kids.

   "We think decency and good sense and normal behavior" will prevail, said
Jack Blumenstein, chief executive of Aircell LLC, which is launching
service on some American and Virgin flights in 2008.

   Alaska, which plans to start offering service on some flights in the
spring, said the same guidelines apply whether a passenger is flipping
through a magazine, watching a DVD on a laptop or surfing the Web.

   "Occasionally we do have conversations with customers about content,"
Alaska spokeswoman Amanda Tobin Bielawski said.

   In many ways, airlines are facing issues similar to those encountered by
Wi-Fi networks on the ground — at airports, coffee shops and other
public places.

   Glenn Fleishman, editor of the Wi-Fi Networking News site, said operators
of public networks generally do not filter because users are conscious
that others can see what they surf. A coffee shop employee might
occasionally ask a customer to leave, Fleishman said, "but those stories
tend to be pretty far between."

   Airplanes, however, are different because customers are in closer quarte=
rs
and are more likely to include kids.

   Allowing porn could subject an airline to harassment complaints much like
an employer that refuses to clamp down, said John Palfrey, a Harvard Law
School professor.

   "I think they have a right to (filter), but I come up short of saying th=
ey
have the responsibility," Palfrey said. "I'd rather have the
responsibility in the hands of passengers and require them to be
accountable for what they do on laptops and airplanes."

   Airborne Internet activities — such as hacking and piracy —
could raise new questions about which country's laws apply.

   The in-flight services also could exacerbate long-standing grievances.

   What if the passenger in front of you wants to recline, making it
difficult to surf comfortably on your laptop? What if you're finishing a
crucial e-mail on deadline and an adjacent passenger needs to leave for
the bathroom? What if the person next to you keeps peering over while
you're trying to review a confidential Web site?

   Steve Jones, a University of Illinois at Chicago professor who specializ=
es
in Internet studies, said passengers and flight crews would need to
undergo "the kinds of learning the ropes and learning the etiquette
anytime we put new technology in new settings."

   Just as most people have come to set boundaries for cell phone use in
public settings, he said, "we will see develop social norms for using the
Internet in flight." ------------------------------------------------------=
----------------
Copyright 2007 AP

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

If you wish to unsubscribe from the AIRLINE List, please send an E-mail to:
"listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx".  Within the body of the text, only write the following:"SIGNOFF AIRLINE".

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]