Navy study to urge razing Moffett Field's Hangar One

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Let them know this is unacceptable. Write to:
Mr. Rick Weissenborn
BRAC Environmental Coordinator, Navy BRAC Program
Management office West
1455 Frazee Road
Suite 900
San Diego CA 92108
e-mail richard.weissenborn@xxxxxxxx

There will be a public meeting May 23 2006 at Building 943, Moffett Fiel=
d, CA

Please don't stay silent or assume others will speak out. The more objec=
tions to this awful plan the navy is forced to hear, the better.

Posted on Mon, May. 01, 2006 =

http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/merc.../printstory.jsp
Navy study to urge razing Moffett Field's Hangar One
PRESERVATIONISTS UPSET BY RECOMMENDATION FOR CONTAMINATED BUILDING THAT =
DATES TO 1933
By Joshua Sabatini
Knight Ridder

A Navy study due out Friday will recommend demolishing the historic Hang=
ar One at Moffett Field in Mountain View, the agency announced in a news=
paper advertisement.

``It's totally unacceptable,'' said Lenny Siegel, founder of the Save Ha=
ngar One Committee. ``The hangar is irreplaceable. There ought to be a w=
ay to save it without all the hazardous substance built into it.''

Hangar One -- built in 1933 to house the airship U.S.S. Macon -- was fou=
nd to be contaminated with lead, asbestos and PCBs in the late 1990s. Th=
e Navy is responsible for cleaning up Moffett Field, which once was a Na=
val Air Station. NASA Ames Research Center now occupies the land.

To what extent and how the Navy cleans up Moffett Field have come under =
fire in the past.

Now taking center stage in the cleanup debate is how the Navy will remed=
iate the contaminated hangar, which some consider a national landmark, a=
kin to the Eiffel Tower in Paris or the Golden Gate Bridge in San Franci=
sco.

The Navy's engineering evaluation and cost analysis study for Hangar One=
 will detail 13 options for cleaning up the 200-foot-high and 300-foot-w=
ide hangar.

The Navy is usually tight-lipped about its Moffett Field decisions until=
 the studies are issued, but broke this tradition last week by placing a=
n ad in Friday's edition of the local community weekly, the Mountain Vie=
w Voice. Navy officials were unavailable for comment Sunday.

The contents of the ad quickly circulated through an e-mail message netw=
ork established by Save Hangar One committee members.

``The recommended alternative consists of complete demolition and off-si=
te disposal of Hangar One,'' the ad states.

The ad also said as part of demolition, the Navy would document the stru=
cture's history with such things as photos and drawings as well as mark =
the hangar site with something ``to denote the size of the structure,'' =
as it once stood.

Demolition ``provides the best solution because the contaminant source (=
the hangar siding and structure) would be completely controlled by remov=
ing the source from the site,'' the ad said.

The report will come out Friday for a 30-day public review period. A pub=
lic meeting in building 943 at Moffett Field will be held by the Navy on=
 May 23 from 7 to 9 p.m. to discuss the study.

It won't be clear why demolition is the best option for the Navy until t=
he report comes out, but it's likely the other possible options, such as=
 encapsulating the structure to contain the pollutants, proved costlier =
and required some form of maintenance in the future, something the Navy =
and NASA would frown upon.

Siegel said he wasn't surprised by the Navy's recommendation since the `=
`Navy didn't start out with that goal'' of preserving the hangar to allo=
w for reuse.

``It will be a terrible loss to the entire community,'' said Bob Moss, w=
ho sits on the Restoration Advisory Board, a Navy set-up community group=
 charged with overseeing its Moffett Field cleanup. ``Not only is it a l=
andmark, but if it was made usable it would be a valuable opportunity fo=
r an awful lot of organizations to move in there and use it effectively.=
''
__________________
Support Team Twin Towers: http://teamtwintowers.org/
The Unofficial JFK Airport 50th Anniversary Page: http://members.tripod.=
com/~psa188/
The best slide auction on the net:
http://www.auctiontransportation.com/sites/psa188/ 

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]