Re: SFGate: A shorter runway solves a long problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: "Bill Hough" <psa188@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 2:00 PM


This sounds too good to be true.
<snip>
   Suppose, on foggy or cloudy days, that the Federal Aviation 
Administration
closed the initial 2,000 or 3,000 or 4,000 or 5,000 feet of SFO's very
long runway 28R and had planes begin their landings near the runway's
midpoint, that is, with 10,000 or 9,000 or 8,000 or 7,000 feet of runway
remaining. Then the federal rule requiring 4,300 feet of horizontal
separation between planes shouldn't be a problem, because planes
approaching the right runway would always be hundreds of feet above 
those
approaching the left runway.
<snip>

Will wing tip vortices be a problem?  How much SFO traffic is heavy?

Gerry
http://www.pbase.com/gfoley9999/
http://www.wilowud.net/
http://home.columbus.rr.com/gfoley
http://www.fortunecity.com/victorian/pollock/263/egypt/egypt.html
http://foley.foleypages.net/~gerry/

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]