SFGate: Discount airlines get squeezed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



=20
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This article was sent to you by someone who found it on SFGate.
The original article can be found on SFGate.com here:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=3D/news/archive/2005/01/17/f=
inancial1216EST0035.DTL
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Monday, January 17, 2005 (AP)
Discount airlines get squeezed
EVAN PEREZ and NICOLE HARRIS, The Wall Street Journal


   (01-17) 09:16 PST (AP) --
   For years, discount airline AirTran Airways tormented Delta Air Lines by
offering low fares its much-bigger rival struggled to match. As Delta
battled pilots over contract terms, AirTran announced 2003 profit of $101
million, its biggest ever. The airline was flying coast-to-coast for the
first time on a brand-new fleet.
   But last year AirTran, a unit of AirTran Holdings Inc., began to find
itself tormented by even cheaper upstarts. Particularly irritating was
Independence Air, a new discount carrier that planned to compete on
AirTran's lucrative Atlanta-to-Washington, D.C., route with fares that
seemed impossibly low.
   Also last year, Delta, which dominates Atlanta where AirTran has a hub,
was accomplishing what once seemed unthinkable: wringing massive pay
concessions from pilots and aggressively paring operating costs. Earlier
this month, Atlanta-based Delta slashed its most expensive fares by as
much as 50 percent, instantly erasing a chunk of AirTran's price
advantage.
   AirTran and other discount airlines now find themselves in a squeeze that
shows just how swiftly fortunes change in the modern U.S. economy. In
market after market over the past decade, AirTran and other similar
carriers have crippled entrenched airlines such as Delta with a
combination of ultra-low fares, lean operating costs and clever marketing.
But just as they were claiming victory in the airline wars, the
discounters are getting challenged from below by a new crop of
even-cheaper rivals, and from above by big traditional carriers that are
finally getting more competitive.
   The nation's giant old airlines have retooled their operations and are n=
ow
mounting effective challenges. Last year, for example, UAL Corp.'s United
Airlines won a series of pay concessions from pilots, mechanics and flight
attendants and is seeking more. The world's largest airline, AMR Corp.'s
American Airlines, threatened a bankruptcy filing in early 2003 to wring
cuts from workers. US Airways Group Inc., the seventh-largest airline, has
slashed pay so low that its pilots make less than their counterparts at
Southwest Airlines, the most successful discount carrier.
   At the low end, a new crop of insolent insurgents including Independence;
Virgin America, a planned discount carrier by Richard Branson's Virgin
Group Ltd.; and Primaris Airlines, a new Las Vegas-based carrier, intend
to beat the older discount airlines at their own game. For a time this
winter, Independence, a unit of FLYi Inc., cut its $79 one-way fare from
Atlanta to Washington Dulles International Airport by $20. AirTran and
others followed suit, wrecking profits on the route.
   "The $59 fare is one of the silliest things I have ever seen," says Robe=
rt
Fornaro, AirTran's president and chief operating officer, referring to
Independence. Never mind that back when AirTran was called ValuJet, it
charged into the same market with a $59 fare. AirTran says its fare was
only introductory.
   There's little doubt that discounters such as AirTran remain among the
most promising players in the airline business. Two older airlines with
high fixed costs are currently in bankruptcy court: United and US Airways.
In 2004's third quarter, it cost these carriers an average of 10.3 cents
to fly one seat a mile, a standard industry cost measure. That's a third
higher than low-cost carriers.
   Discount airlines carry more than 30 percent of nonconnecting domestic
passengers, based on statistics from 2004's first quarter, the most recent
data available. They now reach markets containing about 85 percent of U.S.
passengers, according to the Government Accountability Office, the
investigative arm of Congress. Some bargain airlines are expanding into
places previously untouched by their low prices, such as Mexico and the
Caribbean.
   But the triumphant atmosphere that thrilled this group a little more than
a year ago has now gone. ATA Holdings Corp.'s ATA Airlines filed for
bankruptcy-court protection in October. JetBlue Airways, a highly
successful low-cost start-up, has seen its operating margins crimped
recently and expects to post a rare loss for the fourth quarter. "What
worked in the past won't necessarily work in the future," says Gary Kelly,
the new chief executive of Southwest.
   AirTran's CEO, Joe Leonard, says his company is "seeing intense
competition from all elements." To the naysayers who think AirTran will be
crippled by the industry's latest twist, Mr. Leonard says they're "dead
wrong." He says many of these critics also predicted five years ago that
AirTran wouldn't survive at all.
   Even in a notably cyclical industry, AirTran's roller-coaster fortunes
stand out. The airline, which started flying in 1993 as ValuJet,
challenged Delta by offering cut-rate fares out of Atlanta. ValuJet's
"critter" logo -- the smiling airplane sketched on the side of its
aircraft -- started cropping up all over, and profits rolled in thanks to
rock-bottom costs.
   Its early success came to a halt on a Saturday afternoon in May 1996 when
ValuJet flight 592 crashed in the Everglades, killing 110 people.
Investigators blamed oxygen canisters loaded onto the plane. ValuJet shut
down for three months because of the crash. By the time the airline could
fly again, not even its budget fares could coax passengers into empty
seats.
   In 1997, ValuJet merged with a smaller Orlando, Fla., carrier and took i=
ts
name. The new AirTran moved its headquarters to Orlando and began a period
of conservative expansion. In 1999, when Mr. Leonard took the helm,
AirTran was running low on cash after missing out on the late 1990s
bonanza in business travel. Mr. Leonard installed a new management team
and set about restructuring routes and using aggressive fare sales to fill
planes.
   The Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks took a toll on AirTran as it did a=
ll
other airlines. But AirTran was able to navigate the downturn better than
the major airlines, partly because it had rebuilt its cash position, but
also because of its low costs. By early 2004, AirTran had one of the
youngest fleets in the industry and as older rivals struggled, low-cost
airlines such as AirTran became leaders in the industry.
   Last summer, Delta insiders say, a top executive cited AirTran in a
meeting with employees, declaring that Delta's mistake was letting "the
camel get its nose under the tent."
   Told of the remark in an interview, Mr. Leonard retorted: "Nose under the
tent? The camel's inside the tent!"
   Now, AirTran is experiencing something similar to what it did to Delta.
Independence Air, formerly Atlantic Coast Airlines, used to be a
profitable contract carrier operating regional flights on behalf of United
and Delta. But when United tried to squeeze it for better terms as part of
a bankruptcy restructuring, Atlantic Coast transformed itself into the
first low-fare airline flying small regional jets. In June, rechristened
Independence, it launched cut-rate service from Washington's Dulles and
now reaches 38 cities.
   Independence has made a number of mistakes, including not initially maki=
ng
seats available on reservation systems used by travel agents, and since
its relaunch has flown planes half-empty. Its parent, FLYi, lost $51 on
every passenger it flew in the third quarter. The airline recently said it
intends to cut its schedule and return 10 jets to lessor General Electric
Co. But despite those stumbles, Independence is also working to secure a
$19.5 million loan from GE, which will be enough to keep it going for
months to come.
   Rick DeLisi, a spokesman for Independence Air, says his airline considers
its main competitors big, older carriers such as United and US Airways,
not low-cost airlines such as AirTran.
   Privately, executives of AirTran and other low-cost carriers recognize
that a new, potentially bloody chapter in the airline battles is opening.
Wall Street analysts say the next round will be particularly hard on
companies such as AirTran, partly because their strategy relies on
undercutting rivals' fares.
   In an October conference call with analysts discussing its third-quarter
performance, Stan Gadek, AirTran's chief financial officer, warned of a
continuing "weak revenue environment" for coming months "as long as
airlines continued to add capacity without regard to financial performance
or fiscal responsibility." Mr. Fornaro, AirTran's president, said
competition with Independence Air cost AirTran as much as $6 million in
third-quarter revenue. AirTran's third-quarter revenue was $245.6 million.
More significantly to AirTran, Independence Air's rock-bottom fares to
Washington have been hurting one of its more profitable routes.
   Virgin America, which hasn't detailed its routes, plans to match low far=
es
with stylish amenities, a segment of the industry where JetBlue and
Delta's Song discount unit are already fighting it out. Primaris plans to
model its operations on low-cost carriers but offer all-business-class
service, possibly siphoning away big airlines' corporate travelers
business and competing with low-cost business-class seats on AirTran and
Spirit Airlines Inc., another discount operator.
   At the other end of the market, Delta's revamp is enabling it to become a
more-viable competitor. After years of dismissing low-cost carriers as
fly-by-night charter operators, Delta's top management, facing bankruptcy,
last year mapped out a survival strategy based on cost cuts and a retooled
domestic pricing structure.
   In August last year, the airline began a test of its new fare formula
called SimpliFares in Cincinnati. Since its introduction, Delta's
passenger traffic there is up about 30 percent, largely from customers who
had been driving to other airports to avoid the airline's steep fares.
"There's no doubt about it that the SimpliFares did it," says Ted
Bushelman, a Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport spokesman.
   At Ohio's nearby Dayton International Airport, year-over-year passenger
growth for AirTran, the third-largest airline there, slowed to 9.3 percent
in November compared with 38 percent in August, the month Delta started
its test. AirTran says the slowdown was typical of the post-summer
falloff.
   In November, Delta pilots, then the highest-paid in the industry, approv=
ed
a 32.5 percent pay cut with the airline minutes from seeking bankruptcy
protection.
   Delta also imposed deep cuts on other workers, including a 10 percent
salary reduction for flight attendants. Altogether, it has cut more than
$12 billion in operational costs since mid-2002.
   The cuts helped Delta introduce new low fares. A last-minute, one-way
ticket between Atlanta and New York's La Guardia Airport now costs $389,
down from $726. AirTran charges $199 on that route. There used to be an
$870 difference between Delta and AirTran's price for an unrestricted,
one-way fare from Atlanta to Los Angeles. That gap is now $213. Delta also
ditched an unpopular rule requiring a Saturday-night stay for its cheapest
fares.
   Delta hopes passengers will feel its prices are close enough to the
discounters to justify using the bigger airline -- with its global route
system, a well-known frequent-flier program and airport lounges.
   "Let it be clear, this is not a fare sale," Gerald Grinstein, Delta's
chief executive, said earlier this month as he announced the SimpliFares
program. "This is a fundamental change to our pricing structure." The
changes are expected to cost Delta about $500 million in annual revenue.
With the increased traffic, Delta thinks the impact on profits will be
negligible.
   AirTran scoffs at the suggestion that the tables are turning. As Delta
rolled out its new fare program this month, AirTran issued a series of
written statements expressing astonishment at the fuss. "SimpliFares is
about as simple as the U.S. Tax Code," it said in one. AirTran recently
ran a spoof ad in the Atlanta Journal Constitution announcing a new line
of jellies. The ads asked whether the airline's competitors are planning
to copy those, too.
   Mr. Leonard, a 30-year industry veteran, says AirTran is about to mark t=
he
12th consecutive quarter in which it lowered costs. "We're not backing
away from anything we have planned, and we think we are well-positioned to
take advantage of others' misfortunes," he says. "It ain't easy, but we're
not afraid of the situation."
   Delta's latest fare moves, he acknowledges, may eventually affect margin=
s,
though they haven't yet. AirTran says it hasn't had to lower any of its
fares to keep pace with Delta's new prices.
   Some of AirTran's more-recent problems have been unavoidable. It suffered
more than most carriers from the four hurricanes that hit the southeastern
U.S. last year. Florida is a critical market for AirTran and the repeated
disruptions of about half its operations was one reason the airline swung
to a third-quarter 2004 loss of $9.8 million from a profit of $19.6
million the previous year.

Susan Carey and Melanie Trottman contributed to this article.

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright 2005 AP

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]