Not every country certifies aircraft. Usually they accept the certification of the country of origin. So, no, it's not a US requirement per se. David R http://home.comcast.net/~damiross/books.html =>-----Original Message----- =>From: The Airline List [mailto:AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of =>Allan9 =>Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 07:39 =>To: AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx =>Subject: Re: You Get What you Pay For => => =>That's a US requirement. Does their country have the same. WOuldn't the =>aircraft have to be certified in their country? =>Al => =>----- Original Message ----- =>From: "Alireza Alivandivafa" <DEmocrat2n@xxxxxxx> =>To: <AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> =>Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 3:17 AM =>Subject: Re: You Get What you Pay For => => =>> In a message dated 1/9/2005 2:15:29 AM Central Standard Time, =>> mgreenwood@xxxxxxxxx writes: =>> The 738 can carry 189 in a single class configuration and the way they =>> pack =>> them in over in their, maybe they added a row or two. =>> They cannot. Because of evacuation requirements and floor space the 738 =>> is =>> maxed at 189. The 739 is also maxed at 189, specifically because of the =>> fact =>> that it has too few exits. If they changed it, they could do around 200 =>> =>-- =>No virus found in this incoming message. =>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. =>Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.9 - Release Date: 1/6/2005 => -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.9 - Release Date: 1/6/2005