Re: Industry Changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



European Union rules prevent state subsidies of airlines.  Alitalia had to
jump through some major hoops to get it's 400 Million Euro bridge loan.

Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: The Airline List [mailto:AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Clay
Wardlow
Sent: September 28, 2004 8:22 AM
To: AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Industry Changes

I may be mistaken, and please correct me if I am, but... aren't a lot of the
carriers in Europe heavily subsidized by their respective governments?

Clay - SEA
Fan of BA

-----Original Message-----
From: Travel Pages [mailto:travelpages@xxxxxxxxx]=20
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 12:20 PM
Subject: Re: Industry Changes

CO could also be said to have abused the state of Chapter 11 to the extreme
detriment of the entire market.  Operating for YEARS under cost in an
attempt to recoup market share totally pushes the envelope of what
bankruptcy is supposed to do.  It is not supposed to reshape a market.

Reminder to all observers that in Europe, when you become insolvent, your
ticket is immediately pulled.  Consequently, Euro-carriers cannot plan to
file bankruptcy as a "what if" scenario in their marketing plans.
Bankruptcy is the end of the operation, and they do indeed behave very
differently than US carriers because of this restriction on a company living
beyond it's means.  Just one reason why Euro-fares are inherently different
and will remain so for a long time to come.

You wonder what US airfares would look like if carriers equated "bankruptcy"
with "liquidation."  Methinks you'd see fewer irrational fares.

Douglas Schnell <dks28@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
CO benefits mightily from cost savings imposed during its two trips to
bankruptcy in the early 90s. In that sense, they could be said to have
extreme foresight.

They also have made a conscious decision to focus on business travelers as
their core market, another decision that seems to be paying dividends.

-----Original Message-----
From: The Airline List [mailto:AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Alireza Alivandivafa
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 11:51 AM
To: AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Industry Changes

I think CO is a good example of a legacy carrier that is treating its
employees decently, offering good fares and keeping up service with things
like meals on longer (and I mean over 2 hours) flights and the like.
They
have a seat-mile cost around that of WN according to recent measurements,
mostly because they do things in house. They do their own catering (decent
too) and keep their costs way down. A cool enough concept that I have
Onepass now and am considering going elite on them next year (as I fly a lot
more now).

<want good service, but they want it cheaply too. If UA, AA, and DL can't
find a way to do that, they are going to continue to have hard times. I
suspect that most people don't care that they don't get the bad airline food
anymore. I for one am not about to choose what airline I fly based on
whether or not they serve food. I think BAHA, you are the exception to the
rule here.>>


---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Messenger - Communicate in real time. Download now.

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]