The article below from NYTimes.com has been sent to you by psa188@xxxxxxxxx /--------- E-mail Sponsored by Fox Searchlight ------------\ I HEART HUCKABEES - OPENING IN SELECT CITIES OCTOBER 1 From David O. Russell, writer and director of THREE KINGS and FLIRTING WITH DISASTER comes an existential comedy starring Dustin Hoffman, Isabelle Hupert, Jude Law, Jason Schwartzman, Lily Tomlin, Mark Wahlberg and Naomi Watts. Watch the trailer now at: http://www.foxsearchlight.com/huckabees/index_nyt.html \----------------------------------------------------------/ A Nation of Airport Haves and Have-Nots September 26, 2004 By MICHELINE MAYNARD Correction Appended BRADFORD, Pa., has good reason to treasure its air service. Without it, the 10,000 people who live in the town, which is nestled in the Allegheny Mountains near Pennsylvania's border with New York, would face a drive of one hour - maybe much more during bitter winter weather - to reach another airport. The end of air service would spell trouble for workers at the big Zippo lighter plant, for students at the local branch of the University of Pittsburgh and for guests at the sprawling Glendorn resort, where visitors pay as much as $695 a day so they can fly-fish and skeet-shoot in utter privacy. But Bradford relies solely on US Airways flights, operated by Colgan Air, a regional airline, which continues to serve the town because it collects federal subsidies under the Essential Air Service program adopted after the industry was deregulated in 1978. And now that US Airways is operating under bankruptcy protection for a second time in two years and is slicing cities from its schedules, Bradford's air link to the world is in jeopardy. Bradford is not alone in that prospect. In Pittsburgh, 125 miles to the southwest, US Airways is dismantling the hub that let residents fly directly to Frankfurt or reach dozens of cities across the United States, including Bradford. By year-end, the airline will offer half the flights from Pittsburgh that it had there in 1997. "It's very frustrating: one week we think we have a city, and the next week, you don't have a city," said Kent George, the airport's executive director, referring to the destinations US Airways serves from Pittsburgh. Martin M. Glesk, executive director of the Bradford Area Alliance, a business group, says the problem is even worse for small towns like his. "We're the very tip of the tail," he said, "and we're not wagging the dog." With the industry losing billions of dollars each year, and half of the major airlines operating under bankruptcy protection or threatening to seek it, such uncertainty is becoming the norm. In searching for a business model that works, airlines are dropping some flights and routes while picking up others at a hectic pace rarely seen before. Loyalty to cities they have long served is a thing of the past, even if those cities are hubs like Pittsburgh, St. Louis, Dallas, Nashville and Raleigh, N.C. At many of those airports, the airlines have dropped dozens of flights. "Scrutiny is being made, at very harsh levels, of what an airline can afford to do," said Michael Allen, chief operating officer of Back Aviation Solutions, a consulting company. IN places where airlines are flocking to add service - popular destinations like Florida, for example, or hub cities they want to protect from low-cost rivals - passengers are benefiting mightily, often enjoying rock-bottom fares. But the changes are causing sleepless nights for airport officials in Bradford and other cities served by one airline that may pull up stakes at any moment. In those cities, consumers have no idea whether the flights they booked in July will still be in the airline's route system come Thanksgiving. That is especially true for the nation's weakest airlines, which are tearing up their old schedules and refocusing on cities that may generate more business. This month, Delta Air Lines, which has warned that it may be forced to seek Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection if it cannot cut costs significantly, announced that it was dismantling its hub in Dallas in order to emphasize other hubs in Salt Lake City, Cincinnati and especially Atlanta, its hometown, where it is adding 80 daily flights. That will mean a loss of 2,000 jobs in Dallas, and one less challenger for American and Southwest, both of which are based there. But those airlines offered far more service in Dallas than Delta did, because Delta did not have the resources to battle them head on. "Obviously, with our current challenges, both financial and competitive, we're having to make some aggressive changes on using our assets," said Doug Blisset, Delta's senior vice president for network planning. Analysts say the airlines have little choice but to quickly abandon routes where their traffic does not justify a commitment. "In the past, when there was not so much competition, you could afford to wait things out," said Darin C. Lee, senior managing director of LECG, an economic forecasting and consulting firm based in Cambridge, Mass. But with low-fare airlines cherry-picking the major carriers' most profitable markets, any delay on dropping money-losing routes "means you could be in a situation where you put your whole airline at risk," he said. No company knows that better than US Airways, which filed for bankruptcy protection a second time on Sept. 12. It has taken a chainsaw to its schedules in hopes of carving a low-fare airline out of its voluminous East Coast route system. Much of that cutting has been done in Pittsburgh. Seven years ago, US Airways had more than 500 flights a day at Pittsburgh International - 89.9 percent of all commercial service at the airport. By the end of this year, the airline will have just 228 daily flights there, Mr. Allen estimated. The airport, built to accommodate US Airways' once-vast ambitions, is becoming emptier by the day. Juan Avila, 39, of Pittsburgh, said his family could no longer fly on US Airways to Kansas City, Mo., his wife's hometown, because the airline had stopped flying there. Ticket prices, meanwhile, are spiking for some destinations and dropping for others as US Airways shifts its emphasis. Mr. Avila, a manager at Sanofi-Aventis, the pharmaceutical company, says a round-trip ticket to Baltimore costs him $700. But if he flew to Philadelphia, an hour's drive from Baltimore, the cost would be just $200. Prices for that route tumbled when Southwest, which also serves Baltimore, began service to Philadelphia in May. "This is ridiculous," he said. James Huscher, 38, of Hartford, says he has to travel on US Airways because it is the only carrier serving the small cities he visits as a pharmaceutical sales representative. But in the past year, Mr. Huscher said, he has repeatedly encountered canceled flights. The airline blames a shortage of crew members for the problem, but Mr. Huscher said he suspects that the flights were dropped because there were just too many empty seats on them. He said he missed being home for Valentine's Day this year because US Airways canceled two flights from Buffalo to Hartford. The closest the airline could send him was Newark, more than 100 miles away. So, despite his bank of frequent-flier miles - 200,000 and counting - he is now likely to drive more. "You have flexibility that way," he said. Soon, that could be the only choice for him and many other travelers. Industry analysts, as well as US Airways' chairman, David G. Bronner, have warned that the airline could end up liquidating quickly if it cannot reduce its costs and find new investors. Last week, the airline said it planned to file a motion in federal bankruptcy court in Alexandria, Va., asking for emergency cuts in union members' pay. Seeking to blunt the effect of US Airways' cutbacks, Mr. George is courting five low-fare airlines that do not now serve Pittsburgh, including JetBlue, Frontier and Southwest. Such a move is not out of the question, said Gary C. Kelly, Southwest's chief executive. "We have the good fortune of remaining profitable," he said, in a jab at competitors, "and we're well prepared to move into abandoned territory." But even Southwest has to be careful in choosing new destinations, and in deciding how many flights to offer, because it must fill 15 to 25 flights a day to and from any destination for the route to make money, Mr. Kelly said. Pittsburgh may qualify, but many of the nearly three dozen cities at risk of losing service if US Airways goes under, including Bradford, are too small for Southwest to consider. Bradford has three US Airways flights - all to Pittsburgh - each day. The climb in jet fuel prices this year is hastening airlines' decisions to leave cities where business has declined, Mr. Kelly said. "If it was marginal before, and then fuel prices go up, now we can't afford to maintain a marginal market," hey said. Even so, expense can take a back seat when an airline believes it must protect its turf. All this year, for example, Northwest Airlines has been on a determined push to dominate cities in the Midwest. It is beefing up service from Indianapolis next month, and has added flights from Milwaukee and expanded operations at its hubs in Detroit and Minneapolis. Last week, Gov. Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota endorsed Northwest's plan to take over the main terminal at the Minneapolis airport, pushing competitors to a smaller building used primarily by charter airlines. Likewise, Delta is emphasizing Atlanta, building it into a superhub and spreading out its flights during the day so the airport is not jammed at certain times. The move comes as AirTran, a low-fare carrier, has increased flights in and out of the city. These developments lead Dr. Lee, the consultant, to say that the current environment is actually good for many travelers, who are finding lower fares and more choices. "Even though it's been horrible for airlines, horrible for airline employees and horrible for airline investors, you have to think that the consumer is the big winner in all of this," he said. Others agree that travelers are benefiting - at least those lucky enough to live in areas that low-cost airlines want to serve. The number of those areas is growing: low-cost airlines served 44 states in 2004, up from 14 in 1990, Dr. Lee said. But low-fare airlines make no pretense of offering comprehensive service. They focus on nonstop flights and consistently profitable routes. As traditional airlines are pushed to compete with their low-cost rivals, passengers in some cities - the smaller hubs and thinner spokes of the hub-and-spoke model - may find fewer flights and higher fares, if they continue to have service at all. "Smaller cities are the most vulnerable," said Mr. Allen, the consultant. Mr. Blisset, the Delta planning executive, said the hub-and-spoke model that traditional airlines use actually protects smaller cities because passengers from them can go through a hub like Atlanta to hundreds of other destinations. If Delta served only people who wanted to travel the 230 miles from Savannah, Ga., to Atlanta, for example, the service from Savannah would be minimal, he said. "There is no way we could support 12 or 13 flights a day there if we did not have a hub in Atlanta," he said. CLEARLY, the business has changed from the one portrayed in old movies like "Casablanca," in which customers at a crowded Moroccan cafe glance up as the afternoon flight to Lisbon roars overhead. "Perhaps tomorrow, we'll be on that plane," a hopeful young refugee says wistfully. Back then, passengers may have been able to count on airlines to fly the same routes on the same schedule, day after day. But in the ruthless new airline industry, where no carrier is resoundingly healthy, such certainty has vanished. "I tell my board that there are no guarantees, because the whole industry is in such turmoil now," said Mr. Glesk, the development official in Bradford. "I guess our hope and thought is that if US Airways does go under, there will be other airlines" willing to serve the community, he said. Eric Dash contributed reporting from Pittsburgh for this article. Because of an editing error, a front-page article in Sunday Business today about the possibility of diminished air service to some cities misattributes an estimate of the flights US Airways will have each day at Pittsburgh International Airport by year-end. The estimate - half the number of flights scheduled in 1997 - is by Michael Allen, an industry consultant, not Kent George, the airport's executive director. http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/26/business/yourmoney/26plane.html?ex=1097213970&ei=1&en=dc6f58c087cea574 --------------------------------- Get Home Delivery of The New York Times Newspaper. Imagine reading The New York Times any time & anywhere you like! Leisurely catch up on events & expand your horizons. Enjoy now for 50% off Home Delivery! Click here: http://homedelivery.nytimes.com/HDS/SubscriptionT1.do?mode=SubscriptionT1&ExternalMediaCode=W24AF HOW TO ADVERTISE --------------------------------- For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters or other creative advertising opportunities with The New York Times on the Web, please contact onlinesales@xxxxxxxxxxx or visit our online media kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo For general information about NYTimes.com, write to help@xxxxxxxxxxxx Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company