Re: SFGate: Airline executives warned to ease flight delays at O'Hare in Chicago

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- Original Message -----
From: "Allan9" <exatc@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: SFGate: Airline executives warned to ease flight delays at
O'Hare in Chicago


> The site the legislators (state) are touting is/was Peotone.  I really
don't
> think the airlines would care how far you had to travel.  ORD is mainly
> connecting flights.  There big objection is they would not want to have to
> build new "support" facilities.  They would not want to support two
> airports.  ORD would have to be closed the same as DEN was or it will
never
> fly.  AIrlines will not support two/three airports.  The City of Chicago
> will not give up ORD totally.
> You'd end up with a DFW/DAL situation and maybe another Wright Ammendment.
> Al
>
New York and Washington have three airports apiece.  How many does Los
Angeles have?

Gerry
http://www.pbase.com/gfoley9999/
http://foley.ultinet.net/~gerry/aerial/aerial.html
http://home.columbus.rr.com/gfoley
http://www.fortunecity.com/victorian/pollock/263/egypt/egypt.html

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]