Re: [Sky-1] "Waiting for the incinerator"?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks for the Info.
============================================================
From: David Kaufman <samhoskins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2004/03/24 Wed PM 02:20:47 EST
To: <Skyone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Sky-1] "Waiting for the incinerator"?

> Why, as the Photographer states, "Waiting for the incinerator"?

"Smelter" or "scrapper" would have been more accurate terms.  Beech is
completing a total buy-back of all the Starships from their owners.  When
the whole surviving fleet is on hand, they will be scrapped.  The airplane,
while being a noteworthy point in aircraft design, proved to be uneconomical
for operators and very difficult to maintain and support.  It wound up being
way overweight due to certification requirements, and the composite
structures and unusual controls are difficult for small operators to
maintain.

After production ceased due to lack of orders, Beech decided they didn't
want the liability of those planes still flying around, and they didn't want
to continue to consume resources on supporting the ~60 examples delivered.
So they decided to notify all operators that support would terminate as of
xx-xx date (further trashing the planes' values), and to offer fair terms
for buying them back.  I think they might have included some kind of
discount guarantee for buying a new or pre-owned King Air.  The owners are
largely going along with it, having little hope of successfully operating
the plane after OEM support is terminated.

It's pretty sad, given the high hopes everyone had for the all-composite
plane when it was announced in the 80's.


============================================================


Roger
EWROPS

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]