Re: [Sky-1] UAL gets rid of the 762s

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I believe these are 1982 vintage, non-ERs, in other words, representing the low
water mark for 767s.

They may be near-run out as well, but as a practical matter no one needs a
"domestic" 767.

- Bob Mann
--
R.W. Mann & Company, Inc.   >>  Airline Industry Analysis
Port Washington, NY  11050  >>  tel 516-944-0900, fax -7280
mailto:info@xxxxxxxxxx      >>  URL http://www.RWMann.com/


B787300@xxxxxxx wrote:

> That's less than $2 million for each aircraft when you consider the five
> spare engines.  The used aircraft market can't be that bad off is it?
> Astounding....  Do all the 767's need D checks or what?
>
> Jose Prize
> Fan of wondering
>
> In a message dated 3/12/2004 10:09:42 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> bahadiracuner@xxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> > Subj: [Sky-1] UAL gets rid of the 762s
> >  Date: 3/12/2004 10:09:42 AM Eastern Standard Time
> >  From: bahadiracuner@xxxxxxxxx
> >  Reply-to: Skyone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >  To: AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Skyone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >  Sent from the Internet
> >
> > Air Transport Group agrees to acquire planes and engines from United
> > Airlines for $32 million.
> >
> > UAL Corp., the parent of United Airlines, reached a deal to sell 16 Boeing
> > 767-222 aircraft and five spare engines to the Air Transport Group Inc. for
> > $32 million, according to a papers filed in bankruptcy court.
> >
> > The proceeds will be used to pay down UAL's debtor-in-possession loan.
> >
> > UAL tried to sell the planes and parts for nine months, attracting three
> > bids including the one from Air Transport, according to the court papers.
> >
> > UAL will need bankruptcy court approval for the deal at a hearing on March
> > 19.
> >
> >

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]