NYTimes.com Article: US Airways Outlines Case for Additional Concessions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This article from NYTimes.com
has been sent to you by psa188@xxxxxxxxx



/-------------------- advertisement -----------------------\

THE DREAMERS - IN SELECT CITIES FRIDAY

Set against the turbulent political backdrop of 1968 France when the
voice of youth was reverberating around Europe, THE DREAMERS is a story
of self-discovery as three students test each other to see just how far
they will go. THE DREAMERS will be released uncut with an NC-17 rating.
for more info: http://www.foxsearchlight.com/thedreamers/index_nyt.html

\----------------------------------------------------------/


US Airways Outlines Case for Additional Concessions

February 7, 2004
 By MICHELINE MAYNARD





Officials at US Airways, which is struggling to meet the
conditions of federal loans that lifted it out of
bankruptcy last year, began making the case for more wage
and benefit cuts yesterday to skeptical union leaders who
have already publicly declared that "the concessions stand
is closed."

US Airways has been working on a strategy since December,
when its chief executive, David N. Siegel, said that
unexpectedly heated competition from low-fare carriers was
forcing it to revise the business plan used as the basis
for its emergence from bankruptcy last spring.

Executives at US Airways, which is based in Arlington, Va.,
outlined the company's financial situation to its labor
advisory council, which includes unions representing the
pilots, flight attendants, mechanics, ground personnel and
other employees. The airline said it lost $98 million in
the fourth quarter, compared with a $794 million loss a
year earlier.

"The company discussed, in very general terms, a framework
of the future direction" that US Airways would take, said a
US Airways spokesman, David Castelveter.

US Airways' unions have consistently said they would not
grant a third set of contract concessions, on top of two
sets of wage and benefit cuts the airline sought as part of
its restructuring. Indeed, yesterday's meeting was not a
formal bargaining session, but a regular quarterly meeting.


Mr. Castelveter, however, said there was "general
agreement" by both sides that discussions would continue.
The labor council, he added, clearly "had a realistic
understanding of the depth of the problem the company
faces, and it appears to be ready to confront the
challenges facing the company."

Union officials did not comment.

US Airways faces a
strict set of covenants that it must meet in June to remain
in compliance with $900 million in federal loans awarded by
the Air Transportation Stabilization Board, which Congress
created after the September 2001 attacks to administer a
$15 billion bailout package.

The airline ended the fourth quarter with $1.29 billion in
unrestricted cash, down from $1.38 billion at the end of
the third quarter. To comply with the loan covenants, the
airline must have just over $1 billion in cash on hand at
the end of June.

Analysts said that they expected the decline in the
airline's cash to continue this quarter. Moreover, this
year has had a rough start for many carriers, which have
been plagued by declines in traffic and delays because of
winter storms.

The meeting between executives and labor leaders followed
weeks of angry exchanges, including a call by the Air Line
Pilots Association for the airline to fire Mr. Siegel.
Another major union, the International Association of
Machinists and Aerospace Workers, has dismissed the idea
that it would agree to additional wage and benefit cuts by
declaring, "The concessions stand is closed."

Last month, US Airways retained Morgan Stanley to find
potential buyers for major assets, including its shuttle;
gates at La Guardia Airport in New York and Logan Airport
in Boston; its regional carrier US Airways Express; and one
of its hubs - Charlotte, N.C.; Pittsburgh; or Philadelphia.


Yesterday, Mr. Siegel told analysts during a conference
call that the airline had not decided whether to sell any
assets. Nonetheless, the threat apparently succeeded in
getting union leaders' attention, said Gary L. Chaison, a
professor of industrial relations at Clark University in
Worcester, Mass.

"This is really hardball bargaining," Professor Chaison
said yesterday. "It intensifies negotiations. It shows what
the alternatives are."

Mr. Siegel yesterday repeatedly stressed the airline's need
to lower its costs closer to those of low-fare carriers. He
said that they had become the airline's benchmark.

Last quarter, US Airways' overall costs averaged 10.22
cents per seat mile, the method the industry uses to
measure expenses. That was in line with costs at other
major airlines, Mr. Siegel said, but well above the average
at discount competitors, which he said was about 6 cents
per mile.

The largest and most profitable of those carriers,
Southwest Airlines, poses the most immediate threat to US
Airways. Southwest plans to begin service in May from
Philadelphia.

US Airways is the leading carrier on five of the six routes
that Southwest plans to fly from Philadelphia.

Regardless, Mr. Siegel told analysts he thought that
Southwest posed a bigger threat to other low-fare carriers
in Philadelphia.

B. Ben Baldanza, US Airways' executive vice president for
marketing, added that he doubted that air fares would drop
much immediately when Southwest begins flying, because
low-fare carriers already operate in Philadelphia. Indeed,
fares there have dropped as much as 29 percent in the last
three years, according to Back Aviation Solutions, a
consulting group.

That appeared to contradict Mr. Siegel's earlier assertion
that US Airways had to be prepared to cut fares by as much
as 30 percent to compete with Southwest.

Robert W. Mann Jr., an airline industry analyst based in
Port Washington, N.Y., said he disagreed with Mr. Siegel's
view that US Airways was not in imminent danger at
Philadelphia.

Referring to the turnaround plan under discussion, Mr. Mann
said, "I hope that isn't the state of the art of the rest
of their analysis, because they are going to be
disappointed."

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/07/business/07air.html?ex=1077170294&ei=1&en=21df871afc1c7818


---------------------------------

Get Home Delivery of The New York Times Newspaper. Imagine
reading The New York Times any time & anywhere you like!
Leisurely catch up on events & expand your horizons. Enjoy
now for 50% off Home Delivery! Click here:

http://www.nytimes.com/ads/nytcirc/index.html



HOW TO ADVERTISE
---------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
or other creative advertising opportunities with The
New York Times on the Web, please contact
onlinesales@xxxxxxxxxxx or visit our online media
kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo

For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]