At 3:17 PM -0500 24/1/04, Bahadir Acuner wrote: >John, >What I find questionable is the 767 being used as a fueling aircraft. >Correct me if I am wrong but this deal was put together after B gulped MDD. >Considering that USAF has DC10s as refueling tankers also, I think MD11 >would be a better choice due to increased payload and commonality. > >If you ask me I think this 767-USAF deal stinks worse than a dead rat. :) > >BAHA >Fan of Md11s. Don't think they build them anymore BAHA. -- Regards, Simon Craig If it's not McBoeing, I'm not McGoing!