NYTimes.com Article: Low-Fare Airlines Decide Frills Maybe Aren’t So Bad After All

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This article from NYTimes.com
has been sent to you by psa188@xxxxxxxxx


/-------------------- advertisement -----------------------\

NOMINATED FOR 7 BROADCAST FILM CRITICS AWARDS

IN AMERICA has been nominated for 7 BFCA Awards including
Best Picture, Best Actress Best Director, Best Writer, Best
Young Actor/Actress, and Best Song. Ebert & Roeper give IN
AMERICA "Two Thumbs Way Up!"  Watch the trailer at:
http://www.foxsearchlight.com/inamerica

\----------------------------------------------------------/

Low-Fare Airlines Decide Frills Maybe Aren’t So Bad After All

January 7, 2004
 By MICHELINE MAYNARD





Low-fare airlines have always promised and delivered one
thing: cheap seats.

No more. With low-cost airlines invading established
rivals' turf and facing new competitors, even what were
once known as no-frills carriers are adding amenities -
including some that even full-fare airlines do not offer.

JetBlue will step up the battle today when it announces
that it will add XM satellite radio, Fox TV programs and a
library of 20th Century Fox movies to its multichannel
seatback in-flight entertainment system.

Separately, Song, a low-cost spinoff of Delta Air Lines
that introduced its own radio-TV-movie terminals at each
seat in November, began selling sweets from Dylan's Candy
Bar, a trendy Manhattan shop, on its flights last month and
will issue Kate Spade-designed uniforms to its flight
attendants soon.

Not to be outdone, United Airlines is promising that its
low-fare carrier, Ted, will have its own multichannel
entertainment system, called Ted TV, when it begins flying
next month. United, a unit of the UAL Corporation, has
promised that Ted will have its own brand of beer and
colorful headsets. The airline will begin with service from
Denver to the West Coast and Florida.

Southwest Airlines, the biggest low-fare airline, has
steadfastly held out against such embellishments, although
a spokesman said it is studying whether to offer in-flight
entertainment. The main criteria will be cost, he said.
Unlike the newer carriers, which began or will start
service with the systems already installed, Southwest,
founded a quarter-century ago, would have to retrofit its
Boeing 737's.

E. Han Kim, a professor of finance at the University of
Michigan, likens the low-fare airlines' efforts to those of
Japanese auto companies, which began by selling bargain
cars and then expanded their lineups - and increased their
sales - with plusher models aimed at American customers'
tastes.

"You go into the market with whatever advantage you have,
in terms of low fares, but gradually, they want to become
bigger players," Professor Kim said. "That's a natural
progression in any business."

Robert W. Mann Jr., an industry consultant based in Port
Washington, N.Y., said not all the low-fare players could
afford to follow the lead of JetBlue, Song and Ted. As
low-fare business grows, he said, the category could split
into plusher cheap airlines and those that remain spartan.
That could make it more difficult for traditional airlines
to compete against low-fare carriers, he said, because they
could not tell if fares or frills were the main selling
point.

But Roland T. Rust, chairman of the marketing department at
the University of Maryland's business school, warned that
low-fare airlines may wind up hurting themselves by aiming
for passengers with too many extras.

"It's a trap," he said. "They are merging into the part of
the market where you can't make any money." By going
upscale, he added, low-fare airlines risked opening
themselves to being undercut by a new wave of bare-boned
competitors.

The only way carriers can remain profitable and offer
frills would be to design the amenities into their cost
base upfront, as JetBlue did. Professor Rust said that
Southwest's willingness to consider adding the systems was
"really shocking."

JetBlue's chief executive, David G. Neeleman, is pressing
his airline's advantage. JetBlue, which already offered 24
channels on seat-back video systems, including DirectTV
programming, will have 100 channels by the end of the year,
he said, including popular Fox programs like "The
Simpsons."

Song's system, which the airline will be installing on its
jets through May, includes 24 channels of EchoStar's Dish
satellite television programming, 24 audio channels and a
video game that will let passengers play against one
another without leaving their seats.

While such technology is new, efforts to attract
budget-minded travelers with something more than cheap
tickets is not.

In 1971, for example, Pacific Southwest Airlines played the
sex appeal card, dressing its flight attendants in pink and
red minidresses with heart-shaped hats and knee-high red
boots.

Within two years of the change in couture, the airline's
business increased by one million passengers, to six
million a year. USAir, a forerunner of US Airways, bought
Pacific Southwest in 1987.

The latest efforts to attract passengers to low-fare
airlines come as the cheaper carriers are already growing
robustly. In 2003, low-fare airlines collectively captured
about a quarter of customers flying within the United
States.

JetBlue, in fact, has become the largest carrier operating
out of Kennedy Airport in New York, eclipsing American last
year. It handled 6.83 million passengers in the 12 months
to Oct. 30, compared with 6.74 million for American,
according to Aviation Daily, a trade publication.

Mr. Neeleman said the cost of JetBlue's entertainment
system was minimal, though he declined to be specific. He
did say that such upgrades are preferable to adding other
amenities, like food, which he vows never to offer on
JetBlue. He said that providing a "soggy sandwich" to each
passenger would cost the airline $20 million a year.

Indeed, despite the more extensive range of entertainment,
JetBlue, which began flying in 2000, will not upgrade its
headsets, which Mr. Neeleman said cost the airline about 20
cents each. Passengers looking for better audio quality
should bring their own equipment, he said.

Professor Kim said the airline had its priorities in order.
"It's not like the days when the airlines offered fancy
meals and cushy treatment," he said. The entertainment
system upgrade is "an investment that will be spread over
many, many passengers," he added. "It's in line with
JetBlue's philosophy of trying to satisfy the most
passengers at the least expensive way to them."

Southwest said it is still undecided on the frills fad
because it wanted to stick with its traditional
thriftiness.

"We're looking at the systems but we're by no means saying
we're going to do it," the airline's spokesman, Ed Stewart,
said. Should the entertainment systems prove too expensive,
he said, Southwest plans to stick with its traditional
inflight entertainment - jokes told by its crew.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/07/business/07frills.html?ex=1074492090&ei=1&en=e9f8a562130b469a


---------------------------------

Get Home Delivery of The New York Times Newspaper. Imagine
reading The New York Times any time & anywhere you like!
Leisurely catch up on events & expand your horizons. Enjoy
now for 50% off Home Delivery! Click here:

http://www.nytimes.com/ads/nytcirc/index.html



HOW TO ADVERTISE
---------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
or other creative advertising opportunities with The
New York Times on the Web, please contact
onlinesales@xxxxxxxxxxx or visit our online media
kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo

For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]