They do EWR to somewhere in Japan and to Hong Kong with 777's and those are equal if not more than LAX-SYD. Jose Prize Fan of wondering In a message dated 1/4/2004 10:33:33 PM Eastern Standard Time, mgreenwood@xxxxxxxxx writes: > Subj: Re: Rumor Mill at CO > Date: 1/4/2004 10:33:33 PM Eastern Standard Time > From: mgreenwood@xxxxxxxxx > Reply-to: AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To: AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent from the Internet > > > > Can a 777 do LAX-SYD non-stop? If not, CO doesn't have the equipment = > for > those operations. > > Mark > > -----Original Message----- > From: The Airline List [mailto:AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > Bahadir Acuner > Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 7:05 PM > To: AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Rumor Mill at CO > > > James, > climbing AU $ would not hurt UAL to a certain point. If you think about = > if > they were getting the same amount of AU$s from the Down Under ops, that > would translate into more US $s. > > Remember that in UA's books everything has to be translated to US = > dollars. > So, UA would benefit from this. > > BAHA > Fan of currency traveling as fast of an atom > > -----Original Message----- > From: The Airline List [mailto:AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of > www.airlinesimulation.com > Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 9:51 PM > To: AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Rumor Mill at CO > > > If that rumour is true then it's the best bit of news I have heard in a = > long > time! Perhaps the climbing Australian Dollar means they are no longer so > profitable. > > James > www.airlinesimulation.com > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dave" <thedarkstar2@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 1:32 PM > Subject: Re: Rumor Mill at CO > > > >Didn't know UAL was getting rid of them?? Why would they when they=20 > >seem to be profitable for them.? > > > >Dave > >MEL >