Re: Airbus 340-500

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: "Russell Ng" <russng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 6:20 AM

<snip>  I was referring to the non-stop from Singapore to Los
> Angeles that is slated to begin next year (Airbus 340-500), not the A380
> for which no US airport seems ready for.
>
> In February 2004, they begin the SIN/LAX run, followed by SIN/NYC in
August
> 2004. So the aircraft will be on the ground there for over nine hours. I
> was just wondering if they could fly it somewhere else and have it back
> ready for the SIN/LAX leg.
>
I'll be surprised if they try it.  It's hard to figure more than 7 hours
available for a roundtrip somewhere.  With more than an hour ground stop at
destination X,  that makes SIN-X only a 3 hour flight.  Can you pay for a
345 on such a short r/t, and do you want to risk the integrity of your
premium SIN/LAX service for it?

Gerry
http://www.pbase.com/gfoley9999/
http://foley.ultinet.net/~gerry/aerial/aerial.html
http://home.columbus.rr.com/gfoley
http://www.fortunecity.com/victorian/pollock/263/egypt/egypt.html

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]