Re: AIRLINE Digest - 28 Nov 2003 to 29 Nov 2003 (#2003-196)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



But if you can't get them off the runway to the gate's it's a mute point.
If I'm not mistaken the FAA and/or the Asian counterpart would have to
approve the operations specs/manual for the airport for them to go there.
What makes us/them think any existing airport is capable of accomodating the
aircraft on the "movement areas"?
Al
----- Original Message -----
From: <B787300@xxxxxxx>
To: <AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: AIRLINE Digest - 28 Nov 2003 to 29 Nov 2003 (#2003-196)


> I presume you are correct about having the Asian airlines in mind and it
> certainly sounds logical.  However, somebody at Airbus is intelligent
enough to
> know that the Asian carriers would want to serve LAX with the beast.
Airbus
> should have approached the airport to see if there would be any problems
with the

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]