Re: AIRLINE Digest - 28 Nov 2003 to 29 Nov 2003 (#2003-196)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jose 50% is not enough.
Al

----- Original Message -----
From: <B787300@xxxxxxx>
To: <AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2003 8:22 PM
Subject: Re: AIRLINE Digest - 28 Nov 2003 to 29 Nov 2003 (#2003-196)


> But the improvements needed will run in the hundreds of millions of
dollars
> for most airports and even after spending huge sums there will be
restrictions
> on other large aircraft taxiing or using runways adjacent to the big
beast.
>
> Why should other airlines, particularly the narrowbody operators like
> Southwest, AirTran, JetBlue and Spirit, have to pay increased airport fees
for all
> these required modifications and restrictions to benefit a few other
carriers
> with minimum operations daily?  All of the airlines will pass their
increased
> fees on to the flying public so we'll all end up paying for a stupid
decision to
> build an aircraft too large to operate safely at most airports.
>
> Jose Prize
> Fan of Virgin but they and other A380 buyers should pay 50% of the airport
> construction  costs
>
> In a message dated 11/30/2003 7:30:43 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> katana.flyer@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> > Subj: Re: AIRLINE Digest - 28 Nov 2003 to 29 Nov 2003 (#2003-196)
> >  Date: 11/30/2003 7:30:43 PM Eastern Standard Time
> >  From: <A
HREF="mailto:katana.flyer@xxxxxxxxxx";>katana.flyer@xxxxxxxxxx</A>
> >  Reply-to: <A
HREF="mailto:katana.flyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>katana.flyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>
> >  To: <A
HREF="mailto:AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>
> >  Sent from the Internet
> >
> > Well airports need traffic to stay in business. I'm suprised LAX isn't
> > making plans becasue quite a few carriers using the airport have the
A380 on order
> > and it's surely in the airports interests to have as many passengers per
> > plane as possible coming thorough (more revenue per movement).
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > David
> >
> > On Sunday 30 November 2003 05:33, Herman R. Silbiger wrote:
> > >They just should ask Branson to pay for the improvements he wants. In
> > >any case I don't understand why airport authorities are forced to
> > >accommodate any plane than wants to come in. It might actually be a
good
> > >idea if no US airport could take the A380, since no US airline has any
> > >on order.
> > >
> > >Herman
> > >
> >

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]