SF Gate: Feds threaten airlines over discount fares' hidden fees

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



=20
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This article was sent to you by someone who found it on SF Gate.
The original article can be found on SFGate.com here:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=3D/chronicle/archive/2003/10=
/19/TR185806.DTL

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sunday, October 19, 2003 (SF Chronicle)
Feds threaten airlines over discount fares' hidden fees
Micheline Maynard, New York Times


   Even in an era of bargain air fares, travelers can still get an unpleasa=
nt
surprise in the form of extra taxes and fees when it comes time to pay for
their tickets. Now the Transportation Department is warning airlines not
to mask the bottom-line cost of fares, at the risk of facing tens of
thousands of dollars in fines from the federal government.
   Last month the department, in an effort to crack down, once again
published its guidelines that govern how the airlines must disclose taxes,
fees and other charges, in advertisements and on their Internet sites. The
regulations have been on the books since 1984, but in an atmosphere of
fare wars, some airlines haven't been adhering to them in the way the
government would like, according to airline analysts.
   Case in point: The Transportation Department fined Air Jamaica $50,000
last month for violating federal regulations that require air carriers to
disclose fees separately from the price of air fares.
   "There were indications from the aviation community that they wanted us =
to
clarify our policy," said Bill Mosley, a Transportation Department
spokesman. The reminder came as fliers noticed yet another cost associated
with air travel. On Oct. 1, the government reinstated security fees put in
place after the September 2001 attacks but waived during the summer. The
fees amount to $2. 50 per flight segment, up to a maximum of $10 a ticket.
For the vacation traveler who flies infrequently, that cost might be
barely noticeable. But for business travelers the expense adds up.
   So, too, do the various taxes and other levies on plane tickets. In
publishing its policy in the Federal Register last month, the
Transportation Department said the airlines had to do a better job of
letting customers know what to expect when paying air fares.
   Specifically, the department expects details of any charges to be, in its
words, "easily seen" in air-fare advertisements. The taxes, fees and other
costs should be listed "reasonably close" to the price of the fare, and in
a type size that can be read without a magnifying glass. In television and
radio advertisements, there must be a "similarly prominent notice," and
airlines must provide an "explicit statement" adjacent to the price of
fares listed on their Web pages.
   A check of the New York Times travel section showed that many carriers a=
re
complying. As it promoted fares to Asia that were as low as $309 each way
between New York and Tokyo, Northwest Airlines told passengers that they
should expect charges on top of those fares, including airport fees of up
to $18 a round trip, the security fee of up to $10 a round trip, and
immigration fees of up to $75.
   In addition, military personnel, who are being offered discounted fares =
to
fly home when they arrive from the Middle East, are being cautioned about
what they'll pay on top of the ticket price. Southwest Airlines, which is
offering fares of $57 one way from Baltimore to Norfolk, said military
personnel should expect to pay a $3 segment fee and passenger facility
charges of up to $9 each way, as well as the reinstituted security fee.
   The Transportation Department's reminder comes amid a flurry of discount
offers this fall, which is generally one of the slowest times of the year
for leisure travel until things pick up at Thanksgiving. Even though
flights were packed this summer, most industry analysts do not expect the
pace to continue throughout the autumn.
   Kevin Mitchell, the chairman of the Business Travel Coalition, a group
that represents corporate travel departments and business travelers, said
that one reason for posting the low but incomplete fares was the heated
competition the traditional airlines are facing from low-fare carriers.
   "They're eating into market share every day, and the major carriers are
using every tactic they can to combat it," Mitchell said. "They can make
it look like they have the same $100 fare, even if they have to mask some
of the costs to get there," he said. That puts indirect pressure on
low-fare carriers to cut fares even lower to beat the major airlines.
   Not only are the airlines offering cut-rate fares, they have blanketed
members of their frequent-flier programs with free-ticket deals. This is
another focus of the Transportation Department, which reminded airlines
that they must list the conditions and restrictions of free-ticket offers
prominently, using an asterisk if needed to draw customers' attention to
limitations.
   The Air Jamaica case seems to be a textbook example of what the departme=
nt
is trying to protect against. To make its fares look cheaper, officials
said, the airline listed its own security and insurance surcharges
separate from the ticket price. Airlines are allowed to do this only with
government fees; other costs must be folded into the ticket price.
   The airline also failed to disclose the cost of federal security fees and
it did not disclose fees or taxes separately from the price of its fares
on its Web site. The Transportation Department said it would cancel half
of its fine if Air Jamaica did not commit any further violations over the
next year. The airline told the department that it was retraining its
marketing staff so that such problems would not recur. Sandrea Falconer, a
spokeswoman for Air Jamaica, said: "We would never try to mislead our
customers. We just did not follow the rules as strictly as we should
have."
   Mitchell said it was crucial for the government to keep pressuring
airlines to disclose passengers' actual costs, especially as competition
escalates. "Nobody is going to wring their hands," he said, over paying a
couple of dollars more than anticipated on a short flight. But as fees
climb into the tens and even hundreds of dollars, as they can on
international trips, he said,
   "it's important for the DOT to stay on top of this."=20
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright 2003 SF Chronicle

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]