I've read in the past where a certain airline's pilots balked at a certain main level crew rest area configuration because of the noise levels from passengers talking, using the lavs, etc. Lower level would seem to be quieter and preferable for the rest aspect. Jose Prize Fan of making money sleeping In a message dated 10/15/2003 11:17:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time, damiross2@xxxxxxxxxxx writes: > Subj: Re: Singapore Air to launch direct U.S. service in Feb. > Date: 10/15/2003 11:17:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time > From: <A HREF="mailto:damiross2@xxxxxxxxxxx";>damiross2@xxxxxxxxxxx</A> > Reply-to: <A HREF="mailto:AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A> > To: <A HREF="mailto:AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A> > Sent from the Internet > > After a little bit of research, it appears that the crew rest area, at least > for the cockpit, is located on the main deck behind the cockpit with an > option for lower deck. > > David R > http://home.attbi.com/~damiross > http://home.attbi.com/~damiross/books.html > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <B787300@xxxxxxx> > To: <AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 19:38 > Subject: Re: [AIRLINE] Singapore Air to launch direct U.S. service in Feb. > > > >Yeah, the lower level lounges sound better than main cabin level but do > they > >make them lower level for the flight attendants also? > > > >Jose Prize > >Fan of flying 24 hours once not counting a one-hour intransit stop at SYD > and > >one-hour change of plane/clear customs stop at LAX (AKL-SYD-LAX-MIA) >