Re: More 737 stuff

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Assuming GE wants to sell engines (which is a pretty safe assumption), what
is its incentive to price them uncompetitively and lose orders?

Plus, you have Boeing pushing _very_ heavily against any price changes by
GE.  Boeing, incidentally, is interested in selling as many aircraft as
possible.

I just don't see a competitive concern.

-----Original Message-----
From: The Airline List [mailto:AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Matthew Montano
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 10:59 AM
To: AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: More 737 stuff


Boeing also cut a deal with GE for the engines on the 777 LRs.

GE's way, or the high-way.

(which also means GE's price...)

But of course, Airbus with their 330/340s are just across the street.

Matthew

On Tuesday, September 30, 2003, at 08:47  PM, Alireza Alivandivafa
wrote:

> In a message dated 9/30/2003 8:36:44 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> damiross2@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> << It would require new certification
>  Airlines with large fleets of 737's wouldn't buy (no commonality with
> current fleet)  If it ain't broke, don't fix it >>
>
> That explains that.  It is interesting the Boeing made that deal. They
> must have made a deal that keeps the engines from being priced too
> high

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]