Re: Saying Bye To The B757

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In a message dated 9/28/2003 9:04:10 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
BraniffIntl@xxxxxxx writes:

<< The airline industry was in a slump at that time and in order to get orders
 for the B757, Boeing had no other choice than end the 727 line.  The problem
 Boeing faces today is quite similar: too many lines and not enough buyers.
The
 B757 is a classic example as the Next Generation 737s have decimated the
 market for the 757.  While Airbus has but one narrow aisle product
(A318-321),
 Boeing has three with the B717, B737 and B757 - none of which share cockpit
 commonality. (gawd..I'm agreeing with Gordo, here!)  And the much ballyhooed
7E7?
 The B767 line will have to end as there just aren't enough non NG 737
operators
 to make the numbers work.  Now, do you really want to get me started on the
 quirky B717 again? >>

The 757 also offered much better fuel burn and similar takeoff performance to
the 727 (which is why it is so over engined).  The thing that keeps the 717
hanging on is the fact that it is so efficient, airlines are willing to operate
a mixed fleet, as they still save money as long as they keep pilots on one
airplane or another.  The problem with the 757 now is that the number of 767
operators is dropping.  They have a great deal of commonality and are good
companions, but the 737 NGs are now flying with enough range that they rival the
757.  The reason that the 757 is doing so well in the cargo market now is the
same reason the 727 did so well, people are dumping them and they can take off
from anywhere.  The plus is that they have more range and are much cheaper to
operate.

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]