Re: Branson is coming

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yes, Europe too allows for foreign ownership but I prefer living in a
country where my government tells me what to do, not some damn foreign one
David R
http://home.attbi.com/~damiross
http://home.attbi.com/~damiross/books.html

----- Original Message -----
From: "Grant McKenzie" <gjmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 20:01
Subject: Re: [AIRLINE] Branson is coming


> So much for free enterprise and an open market.
>
> Grant
> SYD
> QF
> Not a fan of xenophobia
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David MR <damiross2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 10:12 am
> Subject: Re: Branson is coming
>
> > Just because an industry can be foreign owned does NOT make it
> > right.  As
> > Mom use to say, "if everyone was jumping off a bridge, would you,
> > too?"I do not think ANY American company should be owned by
> > foreigners,especially the airline industry.
> > 2 wrongs do not make a Wright, er, right.
> > David R
> > http://home.attbi.com/~damiross
> > http://home.attbi.com/~damiross/books.html
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Alireza Alivandivafa" <DEmocrat2n@xxxxxxx>
> > To: <AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 15:20
> > Subject: Re: [AIRLINE] Branson is coming
> >
> >
> > > In a message dated 8/19/2003 9:37:15 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> > > bahadiracuner@xxxxxxxxx writes:
> > >
> > > << He may follow the footsteps of Deutche Post -> DHL ->
> > Airborne Express
> > >  deal. >>
> > >
> > > It is pretty stupid.  If Daimler Benz can take over Chrysler, a
> > company> considered by most more important than an airline, what
> > is wrong with
> > international
> > > control of an airline?
> > >
> >

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]