This article from NYTimes.com has been sent to you by psa188@xxxxxxxxx /-------------------- advertisement -----------------------\ Explore more of Starbucks at Starbucks.com. http://www.starbucks.com/default.asp?ci=1015 \----------------------------------------------------------/ Denver's Idle Gates Draw Covetous Eyes August 5, 2003 By EDWARD WONG DENVER - From the control tower of Denver International Airport, Tim Thornton stared down more than 300 feet at the white gates that snaked like tentacles from Concourse A. Mr. Thornton, director of Frontier Airlines' operations here, pointed to his company's 10 gates to the left of the tower. In a half-hour, at 4 p.m., the airline would use six of those to funnel passengers to flights. Then Mr. Thornton waved a hand to his right, at the eight gates used by United Airlines to load regional jets. In a half-hour, only two planes would be parked there. That was the way it always was, Mr. Thornton said: Frontier's planes constantly taxiing in and out of the terminal, and United's presence barely noticeable. "They're not using the gates to their fullest," Mr. Thornton said. "We could do better." Mr. Thornton's insistence that United give up its gates is one part of a three-way struggle among United, which is reorganizing its business in bankruptcy court; Frontier, a growing low-cost airline that is United's main rival here; and the city of Denver, which owns and operates this sprawling airport that was completed in 1995 at a cost of $5 billion. Perhaps more than any other airport, Denver International, on the plains east of the Rocky Mountains, is at the center of trends roiling the airline industry. It is caught between the needs of an ambitious low-fare airline and its biggest customer, a traditional airline that is threatened by the growth of the less-expensive rival and wants to keep a tight grip on its gates. Like airports in St. Louis (an American Airlines hub) and Pittsburgh (a US Airways hub), Denver finds itself financially vulnerable as its major customer struggles to restructure itself during the industry's worst downturn - as vulnerable in many ways as labor unions and aircraft lessors. Adding to the acrimony in Denver are a dash of political wrangling between the recently departed airport director and the new mayor, and increasingly harsh criticism from many residents here, who say that United is trying to manhandle the city by making absurd demands. "Now you've got an airport that's in total chaos," said Michael Boyd, president of the Boyd Group, an airline consulting firm based in Evergreen, Colo. "Put music to this and you have a soap opera." Last month, United, the world's second-largest airline after American, sent the city a list of demands that included building a $65 million regional jet terminal with 38 gates and reimbursing the airline for up to $20 million in costs related to a faulty baggage-handling system. Denver International's fortunes are closely tied to United: the airline accounted for more than half of the 3.02 million passengers who came through here in May and 65 percent of the airport's $305 million in income last year from airline rents, fees and charges. United is cutting back on service, but says it wants to hold onto the eight gates on Concourse A for future expansion - despite Frontier's claim that it can immediately put half of those gates to more productive use. Frontier says it may have to start a second hub somewhere if it is not given more space soon, especially since it announced last week that it would buy 15 Airbus A319's and lease up to 14 more. United wields a bit of leverage in all this jockeying - the bankruptcy judge has given the airline until Dec. 15 to decide whether to reject its 30-year airport lease. Denver's former mayor, Wellington Webb, refused to play ball: he ripped up United's list of demands at a news conference on July 15, shortly before leaving office. A week later, John Huggins, transition director for the new mayor, John Hickenlooper, struck a more conciliatory tone, saying that the city wanted a "comprehensive settlement" that "also meets our needs to keep the airport healthy and allow competitors to grow." After a couple of weeks of silence, airport officials met with United for three hours yesterday morning. On July 18, in the middle of this imbroglio, Mayor Hickenlooper accepted the resignation of Bruce Baumgartner, the airport director. An official in the mayor's office said that Mayor Hickenlooper was upset with Mr. Baumgartner for announcing several days earlier that the airport would build a $300 million, 16-gate extension to Concourse A that would largely benefit Frontier - without first telling the mayor. Conflicts such as the one here at Denver could change the way airports deal with carriers. Having learned a difficult lesson, airports might want to hedge their bets by wooing several airlines instead of relying on just one for a huge chunk of revenue, industry experts said. To smooth out the gate issue, especially where expanding low-cost airlines compete with a big network carrier, airports could include stricter productivity demands in airlines' leases. "Before, at a hub dominated by a carrier, a community could make a decision that working for the interest of the carrier was working for the interest of the community," said Steve Van Beek, a senior vice president of Airports Council International-North America, the industry's main trade group in this country. "You're willing to say, `I see why the interests of US Air or the interests of United are congruent with my interests.' But when you get into bankruptcy, you create a new dynamic and a new skepticism in those communities." United declined to make any executives at its headquarters in Chicago or in Denver available for interviews. Jeff Green, a United spokesman, said the airline's demands are intended to force Denver to meet obligations in the current lease agreement. Chuck Cannon, a spokesman for Denver International, said United was meeting the minimum requirement for gate use stipulated in its lease - three jet turnovers per day averaged across all of the airline's gates. United uses its gates on Concourse B, its main terminal, much more often than the eight in dispute on Concourse A. United's share of passengers in Denver has dwindled over the last three years, but the airport has given it more gates. In December 1999, United's main jet service had 65.6 percent of the market and its regional jet services had 8.8 percent, according to airport statistics. The company used 43 gates. Last December, United's main jet operations had shrunk to 53.1 percent of the market while its regional jet service had risen to 9.2 percent. As its total market share dropped, the number of gates allotted to the airline rose more than 18 percent, to 51. Over the same three years, Frontier's market share more than doubled, to 13.3 percent from 5.6 percent, while the number of gates assigned to it rose at about half that rate, to 10 from 6. Frontier said that was not enough. Jeff S. Potter, Frontier's chief executive, said the airline needed more gates to operate more efficiently. He said the airline was unable to time its flights as well as it would like because of the lack of gate space. "We think we should be a little bit more aggressive in making sure those gates are fully utilized," he said of Concourse A. Frontier welcomed the decision by Mr. Baumgartner, the former airport director, to add 16 gates to Concourse A. But the gates would take two years or so to build. Frontier said it needed at least four gates immediately. Furthermore, Mr. Baumgartner said in an interview that the airport did not have all the money for the expansion, and it would be hard to sell bonds to raise cash while United is in bankruptcy. In any case, the question of financing could be moot. Vicki Braunagel, one of the two new airport managers, said the expansion was no longer a sure thing and was being reviewed. "We recognize that Frontier has some capacity issues, and we want to get them the gates they need to operate, but in the most cost-effective way," she said. "We want to get United what they need to operate, but also in the most cost-effective way. That's a balancing act." Mr. Boyd, the industry consultant, said that United's demands of the airport made sense from the company's perspective - it should use whatever leverage it gets under bankruptcy protection to cut its costs. At the same time, he pointed out, United might not have as much negotiating power as it would like because there was little chance that the airline would abandon Denver, its second-largest hub. "United's demands are outrageous, yes," Mr. Boyd said. "But they're in bankruptcy, so they've got to do it." The city's negotiating position is not helped by the fact that it has to pay off enormous debt related to the airport's construction. The airport has to set its fees high enough to pay its debts and maintain its operations, but not so high that it alienates United, its most lucrative customer. Other cities that operate hub airports are finding themselves in similar jams. US Airways, which emerged from bankruptcy court in March and is still struggling financially, said it could shut down its Pittsburgh hub. Gov. Edward G. Rendell of Pennsylvania and other state officials have offered an incentive package worth $263.9 million to upgrade facilities and reduce operating costs, among other things. On July 16, American Airlines said it would considerably shrink its hub in St. Louis. That means cutting many flights, laying off 1,650 workers at the airport and closing a reservations office in the city that employs 540 people. American acquired the hub in 2001 when it bought Trans World Airlines, but the company has had a tough time making its operations there profitable. Here in Denver, government officials and business leaders do not want to look as if they are being abused by United, but they also do not want to alienate the airline. "You don't like unhappy customers, and United is a customer of ours," said Tom Clark, executive vice president of the Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce. "Our hope is that the efforts between the airport and United will be successful. Our goal is more on the success of the airport than a carrier, however." http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/05/business/05GATE.html?ex=1061090442&ei=1&en=8bd9aa1e8e77fdeb --------------------------------- Get Home Delivery of The New York Times Newspaper. Imagine reading The New York Times any time & anywhere you like! Leisurely catch up on events & expand your horizons. Enjoy now for 50% off Home Delivery! Click here: http://www.nytimes.com/ads/nytcirc/index.html HOW TO ADVERTISE --------------------------------- For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters or other creative advertising opportunities with The New York Times on the Web, please contact onlinesales@xxxxxxxxxxx or visit our online media kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo For general information about NYTimes.com, write to help@xxxxxxxxxxxx Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company