Re: [Sky-1] Article: Republic and Chautauqua

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is almost a page-by-page replay of the Mesa
Airlines-Freedom Airlines fight.  Chautauqua's pilots
chose to initially reject jets-for-jobs, which is
their right.  But Chautauqua has an obligation to its
shareholders to grow the company, so in comes
Republic.

And you can't go back after the fact and say, "OK, we
changed our minds, we want J4J."  They got bad advice,
and now they realize there are consequences.

Neither Mesa or Chautauqua made the rules over scope.
They have to do what they can to make the rules work
in their favor, which is their right to do.

Ironically enough, when Freedom was formed, its
largest pool of potential pilots were US Airways
furloughed pilots.  it seems like everyone has to do
what they have to do for their own survival.

Auntie B

--- Blaine Thompson <blainethompson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> From:
>
http://www.courier-journal.com/business/news2003/07/23/biz-front-republic-6445.html
>
> Union opposes Republic Airlines
>
> Pilots claim company hurts Chautauqua, will be hurt,
> Teamsters say
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> By CHRIS POYNTER
> cpoynter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> The Courier-Journal
>
> A pilots union is fighting efforts to launch
> Republic Airlines, a start-up
> regional jet service to be based in Louisville.
>
> In documents filed with the U.S. Transportation
> Department, Teamsters Local
> 747 opposes Republic's request for an operating
> permit and contends that
> Republic is a sham company created to harm
> Indianapolis-based Chautauqua
> Airlines.
>
> Chautauqua and Republic are owned by the same parent
> company, Republic
> Holding Group Inc., and the Teamsters say they fear
> that Republic will pay
> its employees less and siphon business from
> Chautauqua, which could lead to
> Chautauqua's demise.
>
> Republic officials deny the claim ? and say they are
> pushing forward with
> plans to be operating in Louisville by November, as
> they promised nearly six
> months ago.
>
> "The labor challenges that Chautauqua is dealing
> with today will not impact
> what is going on in Louisville," Republic spokesman
> Warren Wilkinson said
> yesterday.
>
> Louisville International Airport general manager Jim
> DeLong called the labor
> dispute "a serious issue" yesterday, but said he has
> been assured that
> Republic is not backing away from plans to make
> Louisville its corporate and
> maintenance home.
>
> He told the Louisville Regional Airport Authority at
> its board meeting last
> week that the dispute is a significant matter that
> he and others are closely
> monitoring. The airport, however, is proceeding with
> plans to build Republic
> a $5 million hangar and office building to lease to
> the airline.
>
> Republic also will receive up to $7.8 million in
> Kentucky tax rebates in the
> next decade if the company meets its projections for
> hiring 355 people for
> an annual payroll starting at $12.4 million.
>
> DeLong said he's concerned that "a labor group
> causing unrest ... could
> jeopardize what is critically important to the city
> of Louisville."
>
> Wilkinson said yesterday that Republic is moving
> ahead with plans to start
> operations with two flights ? one between Louisville
> and New York's
> LaGuardia Airport and the other between Louisville
> and Ronald Reagan
> Washington National Airport in the nation's capital.
>
> The company plans to have 20 planes operating during
> its first 12 months.
>
> Before Republic can begin flying, it must have
> permits from the Department
> of Transportation and the Federal Aviation
> Administration. The
> Transportation Department screens airlines to ensure
> they are economically
> viable. The FAA screens for safety.
>
> Kathleen Berger, a spokeswoman for the F AA 's
> Atlanta office, said
> Republic's application to fly is under
> consideration. Republic filed its
> papers May 23, and a normal approval process can
> take up to six months,
> Berger said.
>
> Bill Mosely, a Transportation Department spokesman
> in Washington, D.C., said
> his agency's screening process does not specifically
> allow for consideration
> of labor disputes. It can become a factor , h
> owever, if the labor union
> claims the dispute could affect the start-up
> airline's economic viability ,
> he said .
>
> In opposition papers filed with the Transportation
> Department, the Teamsters
> say Republic's assertions of being a "strong new
> entrant" in the regional
> jet market is "mere puffery." The union contends
> that Republic is an
> "alter-ego" of Chautauqua and does not have adequate
> financing to begin
> operations.
>
> Allowing Republic to form would duplicate services
> provided by Chautauqua
> Airlines, which provides regional jet service for
> several major airlines,
> including US Airways, according to the six-page
> opposition paper.
>
> Republic disputes those claims, saying the company
> will grow faster than
> most regional airlines and is "well-financed ...
> with more than ample
> resources."
>
> Republic was formed this year after Chautauqua
> pilots rejected a plan, known
> as "jets for jobs," in which US Airways contracts
> with regional jet services
> to shuttle passengers to and from small and
> medium-sized cities to hub
> airports.
>
> In return, the regional jet company agrees to hire
> laid-off US Airways
> pilots affected by the company's bankruptcy.
>
> In the spring, after Chautauqua employees realized
> that Republic was for
> real and planned on locating in Louisville,
> Chautauqua pilots took another
> vote on "jets for jobs," this time approving the
> idea.
>
> The union thought that might stop Republic from
> becoming a reality because
> those new jobs from US Airways could be diverted to
> Chautauqua. Jason
> Hedgepeth, a spokesman for the Teamsters in Houston,
> said Republic Holding
> should stop plans for Republic Airlines because
> Chautauqua pilots and
> employees "have shown they are willing to work with
> the company."
>
> Wilkinson said yesterday , however, that the second
> "jets for jobs" vote was
> "a year too late."
>
> If approved, Republic will fly under the US Airways
> Express banner. US
> Airways will handle all of Republic's marketing,
> reservations and ticketing.
> Meanwhile, US Airways will pay Republic for the
> flights, regardless of how
> many passengers it carries, according to Republic's
> application with the
> Transportation Department.
>
> Republic will operate 50-seat jets. However, DeLong
> said, the company is
> already preparing for growth and has asked the
> airport board to build a
> slightly larger hangar than originally planned, to
> accommodate 70- to
> 90-seat planes.
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
> Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months
> FREE*.
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ---------------------~-->
> Buy Breakthrough Natural Health Specialties at
> VitaminBoost.com $20 to $40
> Naturally Painless Spray, Coral Calcium, No Snore,
> EZ Appetite Suppressant.
> http://www.challengerone.com/t/l.asp?cid=2882
>
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yoMABA/ruYGAA/ySSFAA/DmVolB/TM
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
>
=== message truncated ===


=====
"I just wanted to put a little color on the bridge."
      Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry explaining         the "Uhura" character to NBC executives
Aunt Benet

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]