Re: Clipper Class, My Ass!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Don't forget - up until the late 70's, fuel was very cheap so 3 engines
versus 2 engines wasn't really a factor
David R
http://home.attbi.com/~damiross
http://home.attbi.com/~damiross/books.html


> Considering the short fields and short flights, I think the 727 were more
> efficient on the IGS (Internal German Services) than 737's for Pan Am.
> David R
> http://home.attbi.com/~damiross
> http://home.attbi.com/~damiross/books.html
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alireza Alivandivafa" <DEmocrat2n@xxxxxxx>
> To: <AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 21:45
> Subject: Re: [AIRLINE] Clipper Class, My Ass!
>
>
> > In a message dated 7/18/03 4:30:45 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> > BraniffIntl@xxxxxxx writes:
> >
> > > gotta admire the moxie of PAIII, touting "Clipper Class" on a Jurassic
> 727!
> >
> > Well, PA did have a lot of 727s opperating the German routes (instead of
> more
> > efficient 737s, but then again, we are talking about PA and not
effiiency
> > here).  Personally, I think it should be a crime to use the Clipper
name,
> unless
> > someone starts a new dedicated long haul carrier (like Virgin)
> >
>

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]