Re: Ferrying engines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The VC-10 had that capability as well.

Chris


---- Original message ----
>Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 08:02:05 -0700
>From: David MR <damiross2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: Ferrying engines
>To: AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>I know 707's had the capability of carrying a fifth pod.
>
>The 777's engine has to be broken down before it can be
carried on
>freighters (except for the AN-124).
>David R
>http://home.attbi.com/~damiross
>http://home.attbi.com/~damiross/books.html
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Nick Laflamme" <dplaflamme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 06:42
>Subject: [AIRLINE] Ferrying engines
>
>
>> Occasionally I see pictures of 747s carrying a fifth
engine to a remote
>> location, such as
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/379580/M/. Have any
>> other jets routinely used a similar ability? Was this
needed for 747s
>> because their engines were (for the time) just too big to
be hauled as
>> cargo on any commonly available planes?
>>
>> For that matter, how do spare (or replacement) 777 engines
get where
>> they're going these days?
>>
>> Nick
>>

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]