Alireza said: <The 179 seat A320s at B6 > > will not be at 156, with TV and low fares. I responded: > Correction: B6 A320's currently have seating for 162, not 179 so taking 6 > seats out will take it down to 156 (source: jetblue.com) >> > Then Alireza said : > I also was not saying here that the old B6 arrangement at 179. I was making > the comparison with the max seating and what each airline did with it. It is > sort of like AA and UA flying 250 seat 762s with something around 160 To which I responded: I'm sorry - with the exception of 1 year, my schooling was outside of the state of California so I learned that 162 minus 6 equals 156. But you say B6 will not have 156 seats. Why do you say it won't be flying with 156 seats? David R http://home.attbi.com/~damiross http://home.attbi.com/~damiross/books.html