Re: AC's 744s

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



AC doesn't (normally) use the 747s to Europe. (Mostly 763s and the odd
A330s now.)

And even for routes to Heathrow, the cargo handling capacity is limited
compared to dedicated cargo ports.

I'm guessing not much cargo is going YVR->Europe, and eastern canadian
cargo would mostly want to come out of Toronto or Montreal. But for
those two cities the traffic is quite high where frequency is king.
Hence 763s.

The 340s/330s do some transcon, and the Asian flying out of Vancouver.
Cargo is not traveling to airports like Narita or (I think) the new
Seoul airport.

Squeezes the use of the 744 Combi's further. Fairly good decision in
the end I guess.

Matthew

On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 12:47  PM, Alireza Alivandivafa wrote:

> In a message dated 6/17/2003 9:11:09 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> mmontano@xxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> << Few airlines have routes where they can fill the pax portion of a
> 744
>  AND the cargo version of a 744 on a single route. >>
>
> Considering that AC has A340s, they think they can fill the PAX
> portion of
> the 74M, and pretty much anyone can fill that cargo hold from Europe
> to Canada
> or the US
>

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]