Airlines' sardine seating shows disregard for passengers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Airlines' sardine seating shows disregard for passengers
By Christopher Elliott
Originally published June 12, 2003



JUST AS the busy summer travel season took off this month, American
Airlines announced it would scrap its roomier economy-class seats on nearly
a quarter of its flights serving leisure and vacation markets. Midwest
Airlines also said it would rip out its spacious seats on its new "saver"
service and replace them with narrower ones.
Both airlines are playing catch-up to the competition, which seems intent
on squeezing the most passengers into the least amount of space.

Compressing more travelers into a tiny aircraft cabin may lift the airline
industry's profits in the short term, but it's a dangerous mistake with
long-term implications. Somewhere between the 34 inches of space that's
widely regarded as ample legroom and the 30 inches we are being wedged into
this summer, there is an invisible line that separates order and anarchy,
dignity from degradation - even life from death.  Airlines shouldn't be too
eager to cross it.

There's a direct link between a deficit of seat space and the decline of
civilized behavior on a plane. As seat-room gradually shrank on many
airlines after the airline industry was deregulated in the 1970s, aircraft
interiors devolved into a lawless place. Passengers attacked flight
attendants with broken bottles. They got into fist fights with each other.
The shock of 9/11 offered a temporary reprieve, but as planes begin filling
up again, what's to stop the unruly behavior called "air rage" from
continuing?  Losing legroom is humiliating, too. Every day, thousands of
passengers who are too tall or too wide to fit the narrow confines of
economy-class seating leave the plane exhausted and irritated, vowing never
to darken the door of a jetway again. Their disenchantment with air travel
won't just neutralize the added revenues the airlines would pocket from
installing new seats to economy class; it may also translate into financial
losses for airlines desperately trying to recover from the three worst
years in the history of commercial aviation.

Cutting legroom also ignores the fact that sitting in a cramped airline
seat appears to increase the risk of developing a deadly blood clot. Deep
vein thrombosis (DVT), which is also known as economy-class syndrome, has
claimed the lives of at least 40 air travelers. And it's not just older
passengers with circulatory problems who are affected. A rugby player
recently sued British Airways over a blood clot he said he sustained on a
flight to Australia. A recent study also found that pregnant women and
those taking contraceptive pills are at the highest risk of developing DVT
on long flights. By keeping passengers packed in like sardines, the number
of DVT cases is bound to increase.  Airlines are in denial about the
dangers of not offering enough legroom. They insist the link between
sitting in substandard-size seats and DVT is unproved. In fact, they say,
people want less legroom because it leads to lower fares. And they're just
giving us what we want.  But if they cared so much about meeting their
customers' needs, then what happened to the friendly service? The free
airline food?

The obvious answer is that they don't care about anything other than
generating quick profits for themselves. It's the only explanation for
subjecting their customers to more discomfort, but it flies in the face of
reason for anyone who isn't suffering from the same myopic outlook as the
airline industry. Why would any airline reduce the amount of legroom when
its goal is to attract - and keep - passengers? Wouldn't it make more sense
to go out of your way to make the travel experience more enjoyable?  Don't
look to the government for relief. It doesn't seem to care if we're crammed
into the cabin like trash in a compactor, either. Oddly, there are more
rules relating to the comfort of live animals - very particular regulations
about ventilation,  ambient temperature, food and water, etc. - than for
people.  In many ways, you're better off as a dog in the plane's cargo
hold. For people, the government mandates only that exit-row seats must
have enough legroom so that passengers can leave a plane during an
emergency, and those few seats are among the most coveted on any
plane.  Maybe it's time for our government to say enough is enough. Take
away the service, the snacks and the amenities. But this summer, leave us
with a little legroom.

***************************************************
The owner of Roger's Trinbago Site/TnTisland.com
Roj (Roger James)

escape email mailto:ejames@xxxxxxxxx
Trinbago site: www.tntisland.com
Carib Brass Ctn site www.tntisland.com/caribbeanbrassconnection/
Steel Expressions www.mts.net/~ejames/se/
Mas Site: www.tntisland.com/tntrecords/mas2003/
Site of the Week: http://www.carib-link.net/naparima/naps.html
TnT Webdirectory: http://search.co.tt
*********************************************************

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]