Re: Airport official: replacement for United may be necessary

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



No, the Wright Amendment says NO transportation may be offered between DAL
and non-adjacent states/Kansas/Alabama unless the aircraft seats 58 or less.
In other words, if you want to fly MDW to DAL, you will need to 2 tickets -
one for MDW to an adjacent state and one from that state to DAL.


David R.
http://home.attbi.com/~damiross
http://www.secure-skies.org/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alireza Alivandivafa" <DEmocrat2n@xxxxxxx>
To: <AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 6:46 PM
Subject: Re: [AIRLINE] Airport official: replacement for United may be
necessary


> Of course WN would love to expand out of DAL, but the benefits are so much
> more with Wright/Shelby.  They have a virtual monopoly on the downtown
> airport of one of the largest US cities.  Considering that a lot of the
O&D
> traffic for DAL is to/from Wright/Shelby states, that also helps.  People
can
> always connect if they have to get to DAL on WN.

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]