My point was that if UA folds, the City Of Denver may make some sweet deals (like reducing those high fees) to get someone to replace UA. Under those conditions, Southwest may be tempted. If United stopped flying, the city would lose a heckuva lot of revenue. If Denver's choice was an unused airport that wasn't making money vs. a used airport that wasn't making money, I'm willing to bet they'd opt for the latter (and reduce their fees to attract business). Jon -- Jon Wright mailto:jwright@xxxxxxxxxxx 425-635-0338 ----- Original Message ----- From: <B787300@xxxxxxx> To: <AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 12:07 PM Subject: Re: Airport official: replacement for United may be necessary > I don't think you'll ever see Southwest at a high fee airport like DEN...