Re: Airport official: replacement for United may be necessary

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Each of the extortions placed upon a passenger ticket may be small but they add
up.  My $105 ticket between OAK and LAX broke down to approximately $82 for the
airilne and $23 to the government. That's about a 25% rate.  I would love to
get 25% of something that didn't cost me anything to produce.

Taxes are extortion no matter how you look at it. Can you say "Mafia Protection
Money?"

David R
> The PFC is a drop in the bucket compared to the other fees that airports
> charge airlines for landing fees and various other fees that different
> airports charge.  Airlines look at what they have to pay and come up with
> what it costs per average passenger and hopefully give that figure some
> consideration in computing their fares to that city.
>
> Denver's fees are high because of the amount of bonds they have to pay off
> that were used for the acquisition and construction of the airport.  I
> believe that's why Continental said adios.  I don't think you'll ever see
> Southwest at a high fee airport like DEN or MIA, especially when they can
> serve closeby FLL and PBI for peanuts compared to what it would cost them at
> MIA and suffer no delays behind banks of 30 AA flights all trying to get out
> in a half hour time frame.  I hope they start service to Colorado Springs
> which has been begging them for years to start service in order to drive down

> fares on the airlines now serving COS.  It's a nice darn airport except they
> need a parking garage instead of huge open lot, particularly during the
> winter.
>
> Jose Prize
> Fan of COS getting cheap LUV
>
> In a message dated 5/20/2003 11:18:20 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> clay.wardlow@xxxxxxxx writes:
>
> > Subj:Re: Airport official: replacement for United may be necessary
> > Date:5/20/2003 11:18:20 AM Eastern Daylight Time
> > From:<A HREF="mailto:clay.wardlow@xxxxxxxx";>clay.wardlow@xxxxxxxx</A>
> > Reply-to:<A
> HREF="mailto:AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>
> > To:<A HREF="mailto:AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>
> > Sent from the Internet
> >
> > I happen to have my ticket for a trip I made SEA-DEN last month for
> > business. If someone can tell me what the code is for the pax-fee, I'll
> > find it on here.
> >
> > I've also wondered why they used DEN. DEN was for Stapleton. I guess they
> > figured it would have been too much of an effort to change it since
> > Stapleton was going away anyway. The locals (I was once one) call Denver
> > International DIA, just like the people in Kansas City refer to MCI as KCI.
> >
> > I think the expense of operating at DEN is why Southwest won't fly there.
> > I've always wondered with Southwest preference for using smaller airports
> > (i.e. DAL, HOU), if they'd ever fly into Colorado Springs (COS). What do
> > you all think? It could open up the Colorado ski traffic in the winter and
> > the tourist traffic in the summer.
> >
> > My Denver office is almost on the Centennial Airport (APA) airfield. I
> > remember when I lived there, the FAA told APA to open itself up to
> > scheduled flights, and APA said no. The FAA pulled it's funding but the
> > airport is so busy they can operate without it. If APA opened up, do any of
> > you think Southwest would look there?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alireza Alivandivafa [mailto:DEmocrat2n@xxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 2:26 AM

> > Subject: Re: Airport official: replacement for United may be necessary
> >
> >
> > What is the PFC at DEN anyway?  And why did they use the code DEN, when DIA
> > was obvious.  I know LAX is finally going to go to 4.50, hopefully they
> > wont
> > use it to bulldoze half the airport like Hahn wants
> >

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]