Re: U.S. airlines may stop flying pets if rule imposed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: <lafrance@verizon.net>

Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 5:17 PM
<snip>
> "Either animal suffering during air travel is the rare exception to the r=
> ule, in which case reporting it will pose a negligible burden. Or it goes=
>  on all the time, in which case it may be something of a hassle for airli=
> nes to have to report but all the more necessary from the public's perspe=
> ctive," the Humane Society told the Transportation Department.
>
<snip>

This is  a spurious argument.  The magnitude of the burden of reporting has
to do with the number of animals transported, not with the number that are
injured.

I am not in favor of killing pets, just in favor of logic.

Gerry
http://foley.ultinet.net/~gerry/africar/africa.html
http://home.columbus.rr.com/gfoley
http://www.fortunecity.com/victorian/pollock/263/egypt/egypt.html

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]