Re: DL's new low cost airline

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Both AA and DL have lots of MD-80s, AA even more so than DL. I'm not sure
why Delta would choose the 757s over the MD-80s for a low-cost division,
unless range is an issue in the new plan.

Just a thought,
Nick

At 04:22 PM 10/13/2002 -0700, Joe Pries wrote:
>AA is quite comparable with 757/767 mix as is UA.
>  Matthew Montano <mmontano@direct.ca> wrote:As far as an airline goes,
> Delta runs a much bigger average jet than
>their bretheren.
>
>Delta has a fleet dominated with 757s, 767s with a healthy but
>seemingly relatively small number of 727s and 737s through the fleet.
>Their competition have A319s/320s and 737s scatter amongst their fleet.
>
>I don't think anyone else flies the 757 and 767 in the quantity that Delta
>does.
>
>Matthew
>
>On Sunday, October 13, 2002, at 08:23 AM, Bahadir Acuner wrote:
>
> > While waiting for my SLC flight in ATL last week I overheard
> > a conversation of some DL people who attended the company meeting
> > regarding the decision of DL establishing another low cost airline
> > within the airline.
> >
> > The interesting thing about this was the choice of aircraft: B757.
> > I asked the people (group of 3-4 ,deadheading to SLC) if they were
> > sure that it was 757 , not 737. The person I talked to also shared
> > her surprise with me about the fact that the person in the meeting
> > underlined the fact that it is NOT 737 but it is a 757..
> >
> > Interesting choice.. Besides the charter operators I don't know a
> > scheduled low cost airline that runs 757s..
> >
> > BAHA ACUNER - CFI,CFII,MEI
> > www.bahadiracuner.com
>
>Joe Pries Commercial Aviation Photography

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]