SF Gate: Penny-pinching travelers vs. penniless airlines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



=20
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This article was sent to you by someone who found it on SF Gate.
The original article can be found on SFGate.com here:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=3D/news/archive/2002/10/04/n=
ational1533EDT0699.DTL
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Friday, October 4, 2002 (AP)
Penny-pinching travelers vs. penniless airlines
BRAD FOSS, AP Business Writer


   (10-04) 22:21 PDT NEW YORK (AP) --
   Finished with a weeklong business trip earlier than expected, Brent Baer
approached the US Airways ticket agent with a smile, eager to catch the 2
p.m. flight to Washington and get home before dark.
   But Baer walked away with a dilemma that caused him to grimace: either p=
ay
$246 to change the itinerary on a roundtrip ticket that originally cost
$98, or save his money and wait 5 1/2 hours for the flight he had
originally booked.
   With airlines expected to lose nearly $8 billion for the second year in a
row, the industry has become less generous with customers like Baer who
want to fly on the cheap. By linking hefty fees with tight restrictions,
the struggling airlines hope to generate tens of millions of dollars per
year in extra revenue.
   In short, penny-pinching passengers may have finally met their match:
penniless carriers.
   "The industry is losing its shirt, is flat on its back and is looking for
every dollar of revenue that it can find," said David Swierenga, chief
economist at the Washington-based Air Transport Association, an industry
group.
   Carriers have increased fees for paper tickets and extra baggage, taken
away senior discounts and increased the cost of travel for children flying
unaccompanied by an adult. Hot meals are gone on many domestic flights and
alcoholic drinks no longer come free on international ones.
   There has even been speculation that carriers could one day offer one ra=
te
for passengers who want a meal and another for those who do not.
   The airlines have gotten particularly tough with corporate customers,
refusing to let them use discounts negotiated by their employer when they
purchase cheaper fares aimed at leisure travelers. The cheapest leisure
fares are about one-sixth the price of typical business fares.
   "The problem for us is that only about one in a dozen passengers is flyi=
ng
at full coach fares," Don Carty, the chief executive of American Airlines,
told Wall Street analysts last week. That's significant, Carty said,
because nearly half of American's sales come from traditionally
higher-paying business travelers.
   The latest change by American, US Airways and others -- the one that wip=
ed
a grin off Baer's face the other day at La Guardia Airport in New York --
was to put heavy restrictions on nonrefundable tickets, making these
inexpensive fares less attractive to travelers who require more
flexibility.
   The airlines' message to budget-minded travelers is simple: We can be
cheap, too.
   Air travelers began to curtail spending roughly 18 months ago as a result
of the economic downturn. The trend was accelerated by last year's
terrorist attacks and, subsequently, the industry relied on dramatic price
cuts to lure people back to the skies. The average domestic fare in August
was at a 14-year low, according to Swierenga.
   The rising popularity of Internet-based travel agents such as Expedia,
Orbitz and Travelocity, and the increased market share of low-fare
carriers such as AirTran, JetBlue and Southwest, provide further evidence
of traveler frugality.
   To survive, major carriers undertook a wide range of cost-cutting
measures. Employees were laid off. Planes were grounded. Schedules were
shrunk. And travel agents' commissions, which had been reduced, were
eliminated. But those changes had little impact on the travel experience.
   By contrast, the stricter rules, extra fees and scaled-back services cou=
ld
aggravate travelers, analysts said.
   "I don't think of the airlines as the bad guys as much as I do the dumb
guys," said Ed Perkins, an advocate for fliers who founded the Consumer
Reports Travel Letter. Perkins believes the nickel-and-diming of
passengers might not really be worth it for an industry that desperately
needs to stimulate demand.
   "It reminds me of a corporation that's losing zillions of dollars and
decides to fight back by controlling the way employees use paper clips and
scotch tape," he said.
   Under the new rules affecting nonrefundable tickets, customers on most
major airlines will have to pay a fee to fly standby and those who miss
their flights will have to buy brand new tickets.
   Baer, who works for a Charlottesville, Va.-based advertising agency, was
unfamiliar with the new rules and was stunned to find out that catching
the earlier flight would more than triple his cost. So he called the US
Airways reservations department to "moan a little bit" and the carrier
eventually allowed him to board the 2 p.m. flight for a reduced fee of
$100.
   But that still doubled Baer's air travel expense. In the future, he said,
"the question becomes do I buy the refundable fare?"
   It is an issue nationwide.
   Pete Buchheit, director of travel at Black & Decker Corp., said employees
at the Towson, Md.-based company will still be encouraged to fly on
nonrefundables, which make up 77 percent of all tickets purchased by the
tool maker. But if employees are not careful about making their flights
and sticking to their original travel itineraries, Buchheit estimated the
new restrictions and fees could cost the company $1 million over the next
year.
   "If the attempt was to fence (business travelers) out, I think it's only
going to be semi-successful," said Kevin Iwamoto, who manages air travel
at Hewlett Packard.
   While travelers said the new fees and restrictions are an annoyance, they
said the benefits of cheap tickets generally outweigh the downside. Still,
some said they would be willing to pay a touch more if the industry eased
up on the restrictions and fixed the problems that cause delays, including
the new security-related hassles.
   "I'm almost of a mind to say let them start charging more," said John
Prisco, the chief executive of ELink Communications, a Bethesda, Md.-based
high-speed Internet provider. "That way they can add some services back
and make flying more enjoyable."

=20
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright 2002 AP

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]